Dev teams need more than a place to log bugs. As projects scale, the need for features such as automation rules, real-time collaboration, reporting, and visibility becomes increasingly important.
That’s why exploring Zoho BugTracker alternatives makes sense. Especially if your team is growing, juggling multiple releases, or adopting more mature engineering practices.
Research suggests that dev teams can keep change failure rates between 0% and 15%, a stability band tied to small, frequent releases and strong test automation.
So the right alternative doesn’t just replace where bugs are logged; it strengthens the entire development loop. In this guide, we give you a rundown of the best, tried-and-tested Zoho BugTracker alternatives.
Did you know? Analysts estimate that AI can increase software engineering productivity by 20–45% when it is integrated into daily workflows, from code generation to root-cause analysis.
10 Best Zoho BugTracker Alternatives for Modern Dev Teams
- Zoho BugTracker Alternatives at a Glance
- What Should You Look For in Zoho BugTracker Alternatives?
- The Best Zoho BugTracker Alternatives
- 1. ClickUp (Best for unified testing workflows with templates, automation, and AI)
- 2. Jira (Best for large agile teams that need deep workflows)
- 3. GitLab (Best for dev-first issue tracking with built-in CI/CD)
- 4. Wrike (Best for cross-functional intake and stakeholder visibility)
- 5. monday dev (Best for visual planning and stakeholder-friendly roadmaps)
- 6. GitHub Issues (Best for lightweight tracking inside your repo)
- 7. BugHerd (Best for visual website QA and client feedback)
- 8. MantisBT (Best for open-source teams that want simple, reliable bug tracking)
- 9. Bugzilla (Best for enterprise-proven open-source control)
- 10. Roundup (Best for minimalist teams that want an email-friendly tracker)
- Additional Helpful Tools
- Try ClickUp for a Smooth Dev Workflow
Summarize this article for me pleaseZoho BugTracker Alternatives at a Glance
Before we dive in, here’s a clean, side-by-side comparison so you can quickly scan the best use cases, key features, pricing, and ratings at a glance.
| Tool | Best for | Key features | Pricing* |
| ClickUp | Unified testing workflows with templates, automation, and 100% contextual AI Team size: Small startups to large enterprises | Bug & Issue Tracking Templates, Automations for routing/SLAs, Git Integrations for task-to-commit traceability, Dashboards for live defect metrics | Free forever plan; Custom plans for enterprises |
| Jira | Large agile teams that need deep workflows Team size: Small agile squads to large, multi-team enterprises | Scrum/Kanban boards, Custom issue types/fields, Automation rules, Links to GitHub/Bitbucket, Velocity, burndown, and cycle-time reports | Free; paid plans from $7.91/month per user |
| GitLab | Dev-first issue tracking with built-in CI/CD Team size: Mid-sized dev teams | Issues→MRs flow, CI/CD pipelines and environments, Code review rules/approvals, Security scanning, boards, and milestones | Custom pricing |
| Wrike | Cross-functional intake and stakeholder visibility Team size: Small project teams (2–15 users) | Request forms, Custom workflows/statuses, Automations for assignments/reminders, Dashboards for workload/blockers, Shareable views | Free; paid plans from $10 per month per user |
| monday dev | Visual planning and stakeholder-friendly roadmaps Team size: Mid-sized product and engineering teams | Boards for backlog/sprints/releases, Forms for cleaner intake, Automations for nudges/due dates, GitHub/Bitbucket integrations, Timelines and dashboards | Free; paid plans from $12/seat/month |
| GitHub Issues | Lightweight tracking inside your repo Team size: Large enterprises and global open-source communities | Issue templates/labels, Projects boards, Link issues to branches/PRs, GitHub Actions automation, Inline code discussions | Free; paid plans from $4/month per user |
| BugHerd | Visual website QA and client feedback Team size: Freelancers and mid-sized web or agency teams | On-page annotations with screenshots, Auto-captured browser/OS details, Kanban routing, Client-friendly widget, Export/sync to trackers | Paid plans from $50/month per user |
| MantisBT | Open-source teams wanting simple, reliable tracking Team size: Small in-house dev/QA teams that prefer open-source, self-hosted bug tracking | Simple issue forms, Custom fields, Role-based permissions, Email notifications/watchers, Plugin ecosystem, Self-hosted control | Free |
| Bugzilla | Enterprise-proven open-source control Team size: Medium to large engineering teams | Custom fields/components/flags, Powerful queries and saved searches, Detailed permissions, Dependency/duplicate tracking, Data export | Free |
| Roundup | Minimalist teams that want an email-friendly tracker Team size: Small internal teams and mid-sized technical teams | Email and web-form intake, Clear IDs and simple workflows, Roles/priorities, Change notifications, Python extensions, Self-host | Free |
How we review software at ClickUp
Our editorial team follows a transparent, research-backed, and vendor-neutral process, so you can trust that our recommendations are based on real product value.
Here’s a detailed rundown of how we review software at ClickUp.
📚Also Read: How to use AI to automate tasks
Summarize this article for me pleaseWhat Should You Look For in Zoho BugTracker Alternatives?
The ideal Zoho BugTracker tool should make it easy to capture issues, keep context close to the code, and move work forward without constant copy-paste. Transparent pricing and security that fit your stack are especially non-negotiable.
Here’s a quick checklist that dev and QA teams actually use when picking their bug tracker tools. The ideal Zoho BugTracker alternative should do the following:
- Capture bugs from forms, email, APIs, and browser extensions
- Map workflows to your business rules with custom fields, statuses, and SLAs
- Link issues to PRs and deployments for clean traceability from report to release
- Automate triage and routing with rules that trigger assignments and updates
- Keep specs, repro steps, and evidence in one place with docs and attachments
- Show sprint health with dashboards for throughput, lead time, and severity trends
- Offer SSO, granular roles, and audit trails to protect sensitive data
- Provide transparent pricing tiers you can forecast without guesswork
- Scale from one squad to many teams without rework, plugins, or new tools
Summarize this article for me pleaseThe Best Zoho BugTracker Alternatives
Here are the strongest options for cleaner triage, deeper Git links, and clearer pricing. We compare how each tool handles intake, security, and visibility so your team can track actions without extra clicks.
1. ClickUp (Best for unified testing workflows with templates, automation, and AI)
With Zoho BugTracker (or any basic tracker), work is often scattered: the bug starts in a web form, repro steps sit in a doc, logs arrive by email, PR links live in the repo, and someone tracks due dates in a separate spreadsheet. That’s work sprawl, and it slows every handoff.
Then comes AI sprawl. One bot drafts notes, another summarizes threads, and a third lives in chat. None of them know your status flows or SLAs (Service Level Agreements), so you end up with missed updates and a lot of retyping.
Security can add friction, too. A user submits a bug, gets blocked by a security service, and sees a “Cloudflare Ray ID” or similar missing context on the page. If that Ray ID never makes it into your tracker, the team has no context when they try to reproduce or tune false positives.
ClickUp for Software Teams solves this problem by bringing all your apps, data, and workflows into one workspace.
Customizable templates, docs, automations, Git integrations, dashboards, and ClickUp Brain sit next to each other, creating a workflow within a single system for your dev teams. You log the headers, request IDs, logs, user/session IDs, device/browser, release version etc. on the task, attach evidence once, and watch the issue move from report to release with fewer clicks and clearer ownership.
👀 Fun Fact: Elite engineering teams target a 0–15% change failure rate and fast recovery—key DORA metrics linked to stable, quick releases.
Standardize bug intake with the ClickUp Bug and Issue Tracking Template
Bug reports often come in from every direction: a blocked form on your website that shows a Cloudflare Ray ID, an email from support, a QA spreadsheet, or a DM with half-finished repro steps.
The ClickUp Bug and Issue Tracking Template gives you a single place to log and prioritize these bugs so support, engineering, and product teams can see who owns it and what needs to ship next.
Here’s a quick overview of how it can help:
- Centralize intake in a ready-to-use folder with Lists like Reported Bugs and Defect Master, so every new issue follows the same path from report to resolution
- Capture key details for each bug (severity, component, environment, repro steps, and Cloudflare Ray ID if a security service blocked a form) using Custom Fields and required properties
- Route work automatically with ClickUp Automations, assigning owners, setting due dates, and tagging hot pages or modules as soon as a bug is logged
- Monitor trends with flexible views and dashboards so you can see which pages, releases, or components are generating the most bugs and adjust your testing focus accordingly
💡 Pro Tip: Pair the ClickUp Bug Report Template with ClickUp Brain for cleaner repros.
Once you’ve standardized intake with the Bug and Issue Tracking Template, you can use the ClickUp Bug Report Template to capture clean repro details in one task. It walks reporters through expected vs. actual behavior, environment, steps, logs, and attachments, and you can keep key fields required with quick checklists for browser and device.
From there, let ClickUp Brain handle the busywork.
Paste rough notes or console snippets into the task and ask ClickUp Brain to write bug report drafts or turn a long comment into a follow-up task.
If a public report was blocked and includes a Cloudflare Ray ID on the page, you can log that ID in the task and use ClickUp Brain to pull in related tasks or docs that mention the same endpoint or business rules.
Automate routing and SLAs with ClickUp Automations
Once the report and evidence land in ClickUp, let ClickUp Automations carry the triage load. You can route new bugs based on severity, component, environment, or source; auto-assign owners; set due times; and add watchers so the right people see the issue without anyone playing traffic cop.
Build escalation rules that nudge assignees when tickets approach or breach SLA, notify leads for P0/P1 issues, or auto-promote a bug from “Needs Triage” to “In Progress” once required fields and attachments are present. When a PR opens, move the bug to In Review; when it merges, move it to Ready for Release.
Watch this quick walkthrough to see how ClickUp Automations turns triggers and conditions into hands-free triage, SLA nudges, and release alerts:
💡 Pro Tip: Set up ClickUp AI Agents to watch your bug lists so you don’t rely on manual checks.
These AI Agents can react to triggers like “P0 bug created,” “status still In Progress after two hours,” or “PR merged,” then auto-assign owners, move statuses, or post updates into comments and chat.
You can start from the Engineer AI Agent pattern and tune it for triage, so routine follow-ups (asking for logs, confirming environment, and creating follow-up tasks) run in the background while humans focus on debugging and releases.
Trace code and releases with ClickUp Git Integrations (GitHub/Bitbucket)
Close the loop by attaching the code directly to the work. With ClickUp Git Integrations for GitHub and Bitbucket, adding a ClickUp task ID to a branch, commit, or pull request surfaces that activity right on the task.
As engineers open PRs, ClickUp can automatically move the bug to In Review; when the PR merges, it can shift to Ready for Release or Released.
You see the bug, the fix, and the ship status on a single screen instead of bouncing between your tracker and repo.
This feature also makes audits less painful. You can see who changed what, when, and why, along with checks that passed before deployment. If a public report was originally blocked by a security service, the Cloudflare Ray ID and associated notes stay attached to the same task, preserving the story from the first report to the final resolution.
From there, ClickUp Brain can generate release notes from the linked tasks, highlighting affected modules, root causes, and validation steps, so teams can avoid repeats and reopens.
💡 Pro Tip: Use ClickUp’s AI Cards to explain defect spikes at a glance.
Add AI cards to your ClickUp Dashboards so ClickUp Brain can summarize what’s happening in your defect data instead of you slicing every chart. AI Cards can explain why open bugs climbed this week, which modules have rising reopen rates, or whether there’s a spike in blocked form submissions with a Cloudflare Ray ID attached.
The card sits above your widgets and gives a short narrative of what changed and where to look next. This can help your team convert raw bug metrics into a quick briefing for leads and QA managers.
ClickUp best features
- Coordinate test plans, runs, and sign-offs with the ClickUp Test Management Template so every release follows a clear checklist with defined owners
- Capture detailed scenarios with the ClickUp Test Case Template and link failing cases straight to bug tasks for clean traceability between coverage and defects
- Centralize your defect backlog in the ClickUp Issue Tracker Template so squads can prioritize bugs by severity, component, and source without extra spreadsheets
- Keep triage conversations close to the work with ClickUp Chat, turning messages into tasks, @mentioning owners, and keeping decisions tied to the issues they affect
- Jump into ClickUp SyncUps or record ClickUp Clips from a bug task to walk through repro steps live, share your screen, and keep AI-powered summaries and recordings attached to the issue for later review
ClickUp limitations
- First setup for dashboards and automations takes time if your team is new to the tool
- Large lists and heavy views may load slower than expected on older devices or networks
ClickUp pricing
free forever
Best for individual users
Free Free
Key Features:
60MB Storage
Unlimited Tasks
Unlimited Free Plan Members
unlimited
Best for small teams
$7 $10
Everything in Free +
Unlimited Storage
Unlimited Folders and Spaces
Unlimited Integrations
business
Best for mid-sized teams
$12 $19
Everything in Unlimited +
Google SSO
Unlimited Message History
Unlimited Mind Maps
enterprise
Best for many large teams
Get a custom demo and see how ClickUp aligns with your goals.
Everything in Business +
White Labeling
Conditional Logic in Forms
Subtasks in Multiple Lists
* Prices when billed annually
The world's most complete work AI, starting at $9 per month
ClickUp Brain is a no Brainer. One AI to manage your work, at a fraction of the cost.
ClickUp ratings and reviews
- G2: 4.7/5 (9,000+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.6/5 (4,000+ reviews)
What users are saying about ClickUp
A G2 review says:
2. Jira (Best for large agile teams that need deep workflows)
When squads scale across services and time zones, simple trackers start to bend. Jira gives software teams configurable workflows, Scrum and Kanban boards, and tight links to code so work stays visible from backlog to release.
Teams can standardize intake, map statuses to how they actually work, and automate the routine steps that slow a sprint. If your roadmap lives in epics and your delivery rhythm depends on boards and automation rules, Jira fits that model perfectly.
You can define custom issue types, set required fields, and guide handoffs with transitions that match your review gates.
Built-in automations reduce repetitive updates, and integrations span GitHub, Bitbucket, and CI/CD, so engineers don’t bounce between tools to track the next action.
Jira best features
- Build Scrum or Kanban boards that reflect your real workflow, from backlog to Done
- Customize issue types, fields, and permissions so teams follow consistent business rules
- Automate routine actions with rules that assign, transition, and notify on change
- Link issues to repos and pull requests to keep code context on the task
- Plan sprints and releases, then track velocity, burndown, and cycle time in one place
Jira limitations
- Workflow power can feel complex for smaller teams without an admin to tune it
- Heavy customization and add-ons increase setup time and maintenance compared to Jira alternatives
- UI density and navigation take onboarding time for non-technical stakeholders
Jira pricing
- Free
- Standard: $7.91/month per user
- Premium: $14.54/month per user
- Enterprise: Custom pricing
Jira ratings and reviews
What users are saying about Jira
A Capterra reviewer said:
📮ClickUp Insight: Low-performing teams are 4 times more likely to juggle 15+ tools, while high-performing teams maintain efficiency by limiting their toolkit to 9 or fewer platforms. But how about using one platform?
As the world’s first Converged AI Workspace, ClickUp brings your tasks, projects, docs, wikis, chat, and calls under a single platform, complete with AI-powered workflows. Ready to work smarter? ClickUp works for every team, makes your work visible, and allows you to focus on what matters while AI handles the rest.
📚 Also Read: How to Use AI in DevOps
3. GitLab (Best for dev-first issue tracking with built-in CI/CD)
When codes and pipelines live together, handoffs feel lighter. GitLab gives you planning boards, issues, merge requests, and security scans in one platform.
You can plan the work, trace the fix, and ship from the same place. If you want a bug tracking tool that functions as a complete system where engineers spend most of their day, GitLab is a strong fit.
You can create an issue, open a branch, and link a merge request without leaving the project. Reviews stay close to context. Pipelines run with each commit, so test failures show up fast, and the next action is clear.
GitLab best features
- Plan sprints with epics, milestones, and boards, then track issues to merge requests
- Run CI/CD right alongside your repo with reusable pipelines and environments
- Add code review rules, approvals, and required checks to protect quality
- Surface findings with built-in security testing and dependency scans
- Automate handoffs with rules that trigger notifications, labels, and status updates
GitLab limitations
- All-in-one depth can feel heavy if you only need lightweight tracking
- Admin setup for permissions, runners, and pipeline templates takes time
- Some advanced analytics require paid tiers and thoughtful configuration
GitLab pricing
- Custom pricing
GitLab ratings and reviews
- G2: 4.5/5 (800+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.6/5 (1000+ reviews)
What users are saying about GitLab
A G2 reviewer said:
📚 Also Read: Best Developer productivity tools
4. Wrike (Best for cross-functional intake and stakeholder visibility)
When bug intake comes from many places, customer forms, QA runs, and field notes, teams need a shared lane to keep priorities clear.
Wrike gives you request forms, custom workflows, and strong dashboards, so teams can stay aligned without endless status pings. You can route work by severity and surface owners and keep non-engineering stakeholders informed and on the same page. If you shift between multiple teams and external inputs, Wrike helps tame the noise.
Wrike’s forms capture the right details up front and kick off the next action automatically. Custom fields map to how your squads work, while automations keep handoffs moving. Finally, reports and dashboards make it obvious what’s blocked and what needs review.
Wrike best features
- Build request forms that route bugs and feedback to the right team with required fields
- Use custom workflows and statuses to mirror your review gates across squads
- Automate actions like assignment, due dates, and reminders to reduce manual updates
- Track progress with dashboards that show workload, blockers, and cycle time
- Loop in non-technical partners with shareable views and role-based access
Wrike limitations
- Workflow power and configuration can feel heavy without an admin to tune it
- Add-ons and advanced analytics increase setup time and overall pricing
- Interface density may take onboarding time for first-time users
Wrike pricing
- Free
- Team: $10/month per user
- Business: $25/month per user
- Enterprise: Custom pricing
- Pinnacle: Custom pricing
Wrike ratings and reviews
- G2: 4.2/5 (4000+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.4/5 (2000+ reviews)
What users are saying about Wrike
A G2 reviewer said:
📚 Also Read: We Tested the Best Wrike Alternatives & Competitors
5. monday dev (Best for visual planning and stakeholder-friendly roadmaps)
When product, design, and engineering need a shared picture, monday dev keeps the plan visual and simple. You map work on boards, switch views for each audience, and keep the status clear without heavy setup.
Stakeholders see what’s in progress, what’s blocked, and what ships next—no digging through tabs. If you want a clean, visual layer on top of your dev workflow, monday dev is an easy fit for cross-functional teams.
Where it helps most is alignment. Intake lands through forms, issues move across columns, and owners update status with a click. Automations handle routine nudges, so updates happen on time.
Integrations connect to GitHub or Bitbucket for code context, while dashboards show progress and workload in one place. It’s a calmer way to share the plan without long status emails.
monday dev best features
- Build boards for backlog, sprint, and releases so status stays obvious
- Use forms and required fields for cleaner intake and fewer follow-ups
- Automate actions like assignment, due dates, and reminders to cut manual updates
- Integrate with GitHub and Bitbucket to surface PR links and review steps
- Share timelines and dashboards with non-technical partners to keep expectations clear
monday dev limitations
- Advanced workflow logic can require time to model for complex teams
- Deeper engineering analytics often need add-ons or external tools, unlike most popular monday.com alternatives
- Heavy boards may feel slower for power users handling large volumes
monday dev pricing
- Free
- Basic: $12/seat per month
- Standard: $14/seat per month
- Pro: $24/seat per month
- Enterprise: Custom pricing
monday dev ratings and reviews
- G2: 4.7/5 (1000+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.6/5 (50+ reviews)
What users are saying about monday dev
A G2 reviewer said:
📚 Also Read: Sprint Retrospective Examples for Agile Teams
6. GitHub Issues (Best for lightweight tracking inside your repo)
When your team already lives in GitHub, adding a separate tracker can feel like extra work. GitHub Issues keeps the flow simple. You log an issue, link a branch, open a pull request, and see everything in one place.
If you want fast, repo-first tracking without a heavy setup, this is a natural fit. Issues, projects, and PRs sit side by side, so the next action is obvious. Labels and templates keep reports consistent.
What especially helps teams are the automation functionalities via Actions, which handle repetitive chores, from assigning owners to posting release notes.
GitHub Issues best features
- Use issue templates and labels, so reports arrive with the right details
- Track work on Projects boards with custom fields and saved views
- Link issues to branches and pull requests for clean traceability
- Automate routine steps with GitHub Actions to reduce manual updates
- Mention teammates and discuss inline so decisions live with the code
GitHub Issues limitations
- Lighter reporting and dashboards than full-featured trackers
- Complex workflows may need third-party apps or custom actions
- Cross-team intake and SLAs require extra modeling or external tools
GitHub Issues pricing
- Free
- Team: $4/month per user
- Enterprise: $21/month per user
GitHub Issues ratings and reviews
- G2: 4.7/5 (2000+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.8/5 (6000+ reviews)
What users are saying about GitHub Issues
A G2 reviewer said:
📚 Also Read: Best AI Agents for Coding
7. BugHerd (Best for visual website QA and client feedback)
When QA happens on live pages, words alone aren’t enough. BugHerd lets testers and clients pin feedback directly on the website, so each note carries a screenshot, browser data, and exact location. You capture what to correct without long email threads or guesswork.
If your team works closely with non-technical stakeholders, the tool keeps feedback clear and fast.
Where it helps most is web QA and client sign-off. Testers click a widget, highlight an element, and submit a bug with context. Each item is assigned to a Kanban board with the repro details you’d typically track across multiple apps.
If a form submission is blocked by a security service, you can still log the report and tag the page so engineers see where to start. The result is fewer pings and cleaner handoffs.
BugHerd best features
- Capture on-page annotations with automatic screenshots and environment details
- Route items to the right owner with boards, statuses, and due dates
- Collect feedback from clients and content editors without asking them to learn a new tool
- Keep discussions in one thread per pin so actions stay visible to everyone
- Export or sync issues to your tracker when deeper workflows are needed
BugHerd limitations
- Built for website feedback first, so deeper engineering workflows may require another tracker
- Reporting and SLA controls are lighter than dev-centric tools
- Large teams may need careful workflow design to avoid board clutter
BugHerd pricing
- Standard: $50/month per user
- Studio: $80/month per user
- Premium: $150/month per user
- Custom: Custom pricing
BugHerd ratings and reviews
- G2: 4.8/5 (100+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.7/5 (60+ reviews)
What users are saying about BugHerd
A G2 reviewer said,
📚 Also Read: Issue tracking software
8. MantisBT (Best for open-source teams that want simple, reliable bug tracking)
When you want a lightweight tracker without a subscription, MantisBT keeps things simple. It’s open source, easy to host, and flexible enough to model basic workflows without a long setup.
Teams log bugs and move work forward with clear ownership and task-related fields with straightforward navigation
Where it excels is predictability. Custom fields and categories keep intake tidy. Email notifications make ownership obvious. Role permissions are straightforward, allowing small teams to add structure without needing to learn a new playbook.
You won’t get flashy dashboards out of the box, but you will get a stable place to track issues and ship fixes on time.
MantisBT best features
- Simple issue forms with categories, severity, and custom fields for clean intake
- Role-based permissions and workflows that are easy to understand
- Email notifications that keep assignees and watchers in the loop
- Plugins to extend core functions when you need more than the basics
- Self-hosted control so you decide performance, security, and upgrade timing
MantisBT limitations
- UI feels dated compared to modern dev trackers
- Limited built-in reports and visual dashboards
- Integrations require plugins or custom work to match larger platforms
MantisBT pricing
- Free
MantisBT ratings and reviews
- G2: 4/5 (80+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.1/5 (90+ reviews)
What users are saying about MantisBT
A G2 user notes:
📚 Also Read: Best Automation QA Testing Software Tools
9. Bugzilla (Best for enterprise-proven open-source control)
When you need a stable tracker with a long history and tight permissions, Bugzilla can help your team with its easy navigation. It offers structured fields, saved searches, and powerful queries that make large backlogs manageable.
Teams that value auditability can model reviews and component ownership without piling on extras with Bugzilla.
You can enforce required fields, tune custom workflows, and control access by product, component, or role. Advanced search and reports highlight critical issues across different modules and severity levels, allowing leads to identify trends early.
Bugzilla best features
- Define custom fields, components, and flags to match your workflow
- Use saved searches and powerful query syntax to find exactly what needs attention
- Control access with detailed permissions and roles across products and components
- Track dependencies and duplicates to keep work flowing without confusion
- Export data for deeper analysis or connect to other tools as needed
Bugzilla limitations
- Interface feels dated and can take training for new teammates
- Native dashboards and visual analytics are limited without add-ons
- Integrations often require custom setup or external utilities
Bugzilla pricing
- Free
Bugzilla ratings and reviews
- G2: 3.9/5 (100+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.1/5 (100+ reviews)
What users are saying about Bugzilla
A G2 user said
📚 Also Read: Best Bugzilla Alternatives for Bug Tracking
10. Roundup (Best for minimalist teams that want an email-friendly tracker)
When you just need a simple place to file, assign, and move on, Roundup keeps it lean. It’s a lightweight, open-source tracker with email workflows and clean forms, so small teams can log bugs and route owners while keeping critical stuff moving.
Issues arrive via email or form, receive a clear ID, and follow a straightforward path to completion. You can add custom fields, define basic business rules, and trigger notifications so nothing sits idle. Admins keep control over permissions and lists without a long learning curve.
Roundup best features
- Log issues from email or web forms with straightforward fields and clean threading
- Configure roles, priorities, and categories so actions are obvious to owners
- Trigger notifications on change to keep reviewers and stakeholders in the loop
- Extend with Python and simple plugins when you need a small extra step
- Self-host for control over upgrades, backups, and security posture
Roundup limitations
- Minimal dashboards and analytics compared to larger platforms
- Integrations typically require light scripting or external glue
- UI feels basic next to modern, board-based tools
Roundup pricing
- Free
Roundup ratings and reviews
- G2: Not enough reviews
- Capterra: Not enough reviews
What users are saying about Roundup
A review about Roundup says,
👀 Fun Fact: The average worker receives about 117 emails a day—most skimmed in under a minute—which is why email-friendly workflows (like Roundup’s) can keep fixes moving without extra tools.
📚 Also Read: How to Use AI for Quality Assurance
Summarize this article for me pleaseAdditional Helpful Tools
1. Sentry
Sentry helps you catch errors in real time and see exactly where they happen in code. Stack traces, breadcrumbs, and release health show the path to failure, so you can reproduce fast without digging through logs. Teams group issues, set alerts, and track regressions after a fix ships.
📚 Also Read: Test Case Templates for Software Testing
2. Postman
Postman streamlines API testing and collaboration. Collections keep requests tidy, environments store keys and URLs, and monitors catch failures before users do. You can attach sample payloads to bug reports and share a prebuilt request that reproduces the issue in seconds.
3. BrowserStack
BrowserStack lets you test web apps on real devices and browsers in the cloud. Reproduce visual and compatibility issues quickly, capture screenshots or videos, and attach them to your tracker item. This feature reduces guesswork when a bug appears only on specific OS–browser pairs.
4. TestRail
TestRail organizes test cases, runs, and results in one place. Link a failing case to the defect in your tracker and keep a clean audit trail for releases. Dashboards show coverage, pass rates, and blockers so leads can decide what ships now and what waits.
📚 Also Read: Agile project management tools
Summarize this article for me pleaseTry ClickUp for a Smooth Dev Workflow
Switching bug trackers can feel risky. It’s also your best chance to cut noise and give every bug a clean path from report to release.
Skip the feature, Bingo. Focus on how a tool aligns with your business rules, how it handles security, and whether it maintains context when a public report is blocked and displays a Cloudflare Ray ID. If your system can capture that ID, keep the trail, and help you resolve false positives without slowing the fix, you’re in excellent shape.
You’ll see different strengths across the options, some dev-first, some visual, and some delightfully minimal. Pick the one that shortens the time to fix and reduces how much you click, not the one with the longest checklist.
That’s where ClickUp fits. It brings bug intake, docs, Git links, and dashboards next to the work, so triage moves and updates stay visible. ✨
To centralize bug intake, docs, Git links, and dashboards in one place, sign up for ClickUp and give your team a calmer, faster path from report to release.
Summarize this article for me pleaseFrequently asked questions (FAQ)
1. What is the best free alternative to Zoho BugTracker?
If you want a free starting point with room to grow, ClickUp’s Free Forever plan is a strong option. You can standardize intake with templates, keep repro steps in Docs, and route work with ClickUp Automations without paying to get started. For open-source needs, Bugzilla and MantisBT are good fits, but you’ll trade convenience for setup. If you prefer a hosted tool that scales smoothly, start with ClickUp and add advanced features as you need them.
2. Can I migrate all my data from Zoho BugTracker to another tool?
Yes, but expect a few steps. Export issues from Zoho BugTracker, map fields to the new system, and test a small batch first. ClickUp supports CSV imports, custom fields, and templates, so you can preserve status, owners, dates, and core metadata. Keep the original export handy for audit trails, and use a temporary list in ClickUp to validate before you flip the switch.
3. Which tool integrates best with GitHub or Bitbucket?
ClickUp connects to both through ClickUp Git Integrations. Include the task ID in your branch or commit, and you’ll see commits and pull requests right on the task. Automations can move items to In Review on PR open and Ready for Release on merge. GitLab and GitHub Issues also integrate tightly with code, but ClickUp keeps your planning, docs, and reporting in the same place so non-dev teammates stay in the loop.
4. What’s the best Zoho BugTracker alternative for small development teams?
If you’re small and moving fast, keep it simple. ClickUp gives you issue templates, Docs, boards, and automations in one workspace, so you don’t juggle tools. GitHub Issues or Roundup work for minimal flows, but you’ll add extra pieces for intake, docs, and dashboards. Start with ClickUp’s Free Forever plan, then turn on advanced features only when you need them.
5. Which alternatives include AI or automation for issue tracking?
ClickUp includes both. ClickUp Brain drafts repro steps and summaries from task context, while ClickUp Automations assigns owners, sets SLAs, and flips statuses on events like PR merges. Jira and monday dev offer strong rule-based automations; GitLab adds CI-aware workflows. If you want AI plus rules in one place, ClickUp covers both without extra tabs.
Everything you need to stay organized and get work done.
