Grant writing looks like admin work, but there’s a lot more at stake.
Behind every proposal is a team quietly juggling deadlines, chasing down data, stitching together narratives—and all this in a world where U.S. nonprofits alone receive over $300 billion in government grants each year.
That’s the scale of opportunity. But the real challenge is having the capacity and clarity to tell a compelling story and hit every mark before time runs out.
In this blog, we’ll explore 12 AI grant writing tools that help your grant team write sharper, move faster, and reclaim the focus they desperately need—so they can spend less time wrestling with process and more time fuelling impact.
12 AI Tools That Transform Grant Writing for Teams
- What Are AI Tools for Grant Writing Teams?
- AI Tools for Grant Writing Teams—At a Glance
- What to Look For in AI Tools for Grant Writing Teams
- The Best AI Tools for Grant Writing Teams
- 1. ClickUp (Best for all-in-one AI grant management)
- 2. Grantable (Best for dedicated, grant-specific AI writing)
- 3. Grant Assistant (Best for fast first-draft proposal generation)
- 4. Instrumentl (Best for grant discovery and funder research)
- 5. Grantboost (Best for customizing proposals at scale)
- 6. Grant Orb (Best for workflow automation and compliance checks)
- 7. ChatGPT (Best for flexible, general-purpose writing help)
- 8. Claude (Best for long-form, complex proposal editing)
- 9. Gemini (Best for research, fact-checking, and real-time data analysis)
- 10. Perplexity (Best for research with verified citations)
- 11. Fireflies (Best for capturing and searching meeting insights)
- 12. Fundwriter.ai (Best for nonprofit-focused storytelling and templates)
- Transform Your Grant Writing Process
- Frequently Asked Questions
Summarize this article for me pleaseWhat Are AI Tools for Grant Writing Teams?
AI tools for grant writing teams are specialized software that use artificial intelligence to make the grant proposal process easier and more efficient.
Think of them as a smart assistant for your whole team, helping with everything from research and writing to collaboration and making sure you follow all the rules.
These tools are powered by technologies like natural language processing (NLP), which helps them understand and write human-like text. Unlike a simple spell checker, they can help you generate entire sections of a proposal, summarize long research documents, and even adapt your writing to match a specific funder’s tone.
What makes these tools special for teams is that they’re built for team collaboration, allowing you to work together in one place instead of sending documents back and forth. They offer features like real-time editing and built-in knowledge management strategies so everyone is always on the same page.
💡Pro Tip: If you want to keep your workflow organized and compliant, you might love the Non-Profit SOP Template—it’s a practical way to standardize your process and make sure everyone’s on the same page.
Summarize this article for me pleaseAI Tools for Grant Writing Teams—At a Glance
| Tool | Best for | Best features | Team size | Pricing* |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ClickUp | All-in-one grant management with AI | ClickUp Brain, ClickUp Docs, Custom Fields | Any size | Forever Free plan; paid plans available |
| Grantable | Grant-specific AI writing & research | AI grant writer, smart library, team workspace | Small to medium | No free plan; paid plans start at $24/user/month |
| Grant Assistant | Quick proposal drafting | Automated writing, funder matching | Small teams | No free plan; custom pricing |
| Instrumentl | Finding & tracking opportunities | Grant discovery, deadline tracking | Medium to large | No free plan; paid plans start at $326/month |
| Grantboost | AI-powered proposal customization | Template library, customization engine | Any size | Free plan available; paid plans start at $19.99/month |
| Grant Orb | Streamlined application workflow | Automation, compliance checking | Small to medium | No free plan; Custom pricing |
| ChatGPT | General writing assistance | Content generation, research help | Any size | Free tier limited; paid plans start at $20/month |
| Claude | Long-form content & analysis | Extended context window, detailed editing | Any size | Limited free tier; paid plans start at $20/month |
| Gemini | Research & fact-checking | Web integration, multimodal | Any size | Free plan available; paid plans start at $19.99/month |
| Perplexity | Research with citations | Real-time search, source tracking | Any size | Free tier available; paid plans start at $20/month |
| Fireflies | Meeting transcription & insights | Transcription, action items | Any size | Free plan available; paid plans start at $18/user/month |
| Fundwriter.ai | Nonprofit-focused proposals | Templates, impact measurement | Small nonprofits | No free plan (7-day trial); paid plans start at $29/month |
How we review software at ClickUp
Our editorial team follows a transparent, research-backed, and vendor-neutral process, so you can trust that our recommendations are based on real product value.
Here’s a detailed rundown of how we review software at ClickUp.
Summarize this article for me pleaseWhat to Look For in AI Tools for Grant Writing Teams
Finding the right AI tool for your grant writing team means looking beyond flashy AI features to focus on what actually improves your workflow and success rate.
You need a tool that not only writes well but also keeps your team organized and your data secure.
First, think about security, as grant proposals often contain sensitive Personally Identifiable Information (PII). Look for a tool with strong data security precautions, SOC 2 compliance, and a clear audit trail to ensure accountability.
Next, consider how the tool will fit with your team’s process. Does it allow for real-time collaboration and offer clear version control to prevent confusion? Can you set role-based permissions so that writers, reviewers, and budget managers only see what they need to? The goal is streamlining processes for grant writing, not add another layer of complexity.
Here are a few key things to keep in mind. ✨
- Grant-specific knowledge: A good AI grant writing assistant should understand the difference between a needs statement and an evaluation plan. Look for tools trained on actual grant proposals, as they’ll produce more relevant content than general-purpose AI
- Citation integrity: For research-heavy grants, you need an AI that can provide accurate sources for its claims. This prevents you from accidentally including incorrect information or “hallucinations,” which studies show occur at rates of 28.6% for GPT-4 when generating references—making fact-checking essential
- Prompt engineering support: The quality of AI output depends on the quality of your input, or “prompt.” The best tools offer AI writing prompts and guides to help your team ask the right questions and get the best results
- Integration capabilities: Your grant writing doesn’t happen in a vacuum. Choose a tool that connects with your tech stack, like workflow automation software, like calendars, cloud storage, and communication apps, to avoid constantly switching between platforms
👀 Did You Know: Elon Musk once challenged the UN to prove how $6 billion could help end world hunger. The UN delivered a detailed plan… and the funding never came through. A good reminder that even the biggest “funders” can back out—so strong proposals (and clear plans) matter more than big promises.
Summarize this article for me pleaseThe Best AI Tools for Grant Writing Teams
Now, let’s look at each tool in detail!
1. ClickUp (Best for all-in-one AI grant management)
Bring your entire grant writing process into a single, converged AI workspace—a unified platform where all your work, data, and AI connect in one place—and eliminate the tool sprawl that slows your team down with ClickUp.
ClickUp Brain sits at the center of this workflow as your ambient AI partner. Start by opening a ClickUp Doc and telling Brain what you need: your outline, the funder’s priorities, the story you want to tell. Brain generates a first draft that actually reflects your organization’s voice because it draws from everything already in your workspace—past proposals, research notes, impact reports.
When you’re ready to refine, Brain can polish language, strengthen sections, and keep terminology consistent across every proposal.
Once your draft takes shape, turn the doc into action. Link it to a ClickUp Task, assign reviewers, add deadlines, and tag stakeholders—all in the same place where the proposal lives. Reviewers don’t need to chase files or new versions; they simply open the task and comment directly inside the doc in real time. Every part of the review cycle becomes visible and trackable.
ClickUp gives you the operational structure to keep this momentum. Use Custom Fields to capture funder requirements, timelines, attachments, budget needs, and submission criteria across all your grants. Then build a visual workflow using Custom Task Statuses, mapping each proposal’s journey from Researching → Drafting → Reviewing → Final Approval → Submitted.
Automations in ClickUp handle the rest—assigning the next reviewer when a status changes, sending deadline reminders before submissions, escalating tasks when approvals stall. Instead of managing the process manually, the process manages itself.
And because everything is connected inside a converged AI workspace, Brain can surface insights instantly—pulling context from previous grants or meeting notes, reminding you what worked last time, answering questions about requirements, or surfacing data you forgot you had.
Best part? You can use multiple AI models, like Claude, ChatGPT and Gemini right from within ClickUp Brain to take care of your writing tasks, no extra tools needed.
This is what an AI-powered grant workflow looks like: writing, research, collaboration, and governance in one place—no tool sprawl, no lost files, no bottlenecks. Just a team that can move faster, write stronger, and focus on funding the impact they’re here to create.
👋🏾 Need some help getting started? Use this Grant Proposal Template from ClickUp to get a head start on your work!
ClickUp best features
- ClickUp Brain for grant writing: Generate first drafts, summarize research, and rewrite sections for different audiences. Because it pulls context from your entire workspace, the AI suggestions are more relevant and aligned with your organization’s voice
- ClickUp Docs with real-time collaboration: Allow your entire team to write and edit proposals together at the same time, with live cursors and threaded comments. You can also maintain a complete version history to track every change
- ClickUp Custom Task Statuses and Automations: Create a custom workflow that matches your grant process perfectly. Automatically move proposals from drafting to review to submission, keeping everyone aligned
- Template library: Save your most successful proposals as templates in the Template Library. This allows you to standardize your process and get a head start on new applications without starting from scratch
ClickUp pros and cons
Pros:
- All-in-one solution combines grant writing, project management, and team collaboration, saving you from switching between different apps
- ClickUp Brain’s contextual understanding leads to more accurate and relevant AI suggestions compared to standalone tools
- Extensive customization options let you build the exact workflow your team needs
Cons:
- The wide range of features can take some time to set up and customize for your specific needs
- New users may experience a learning curve as they get familiar with all the platform’s capabilities
ClickUp pricing
pricing-table
ClickUp ratings and reviews
- G2: 4.7/5 (9,000+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.6/5 (4,000+ reviews)
What are real-life users saying about ClickUp?
A user review says:
2. Grantable (Best for dedicated, grant-specific AI writing)
Grantable is an AI grant writing platform designed specifically for the language and structure of grant proposals. It combines intelligent writing assistance with a collaborative workspace, making it a strong choice for teams focused purely on grant acquisition. The platform’s AI is trained on a massive dataset of successful grants, so it understands what funders are looking for.
Its smart content library is a standout feature, allowing you to store and reuse your best content. You can save your organization’s mission statement, program descriptions, and impact data, then let the AI adapt it for new proposals. This ensures consistency and saves your team from rewriting the same information over and over.
Grantable best features
- AI-powered grant writer: Generates targeted content based on specific funder priorities and successful proposal examples
- Smart content library: Stores, tags, and retrieves your boilerplate text, making it easy to repurpose winning content
- Team workspace: Allows for seamless collaboration with built-in task management, deadline tracking, and review workflows
Grantable pros and cons
Pros:
- Purpose-built for grant writing, with a deep understanding of proposal structures
- Learns your organization’s voice over time for more consistent AI suggestions
- Tracks grant opportunities from discovery through reporting
Cons:
- Lacks broader project management and planning features for other organizational tasks
- Fewer integration options with other software
- Pricing may be a challenge for smaller nonprofits
Grantable pricing
- Starter: $24 per user per month
- Pro: $60 per user per month
- Agency: Custom pricing
Grantable ratings and reviews
- G2: Not enough reviews
- Capterra: Not enough reviews
📮ClickUp Insight: 18% of our survey respondents want to use AI to organize their lives through calendars, tasks, and reminders. Another 15% want AI to handle routine tasks and administrative work.
To do this, an AI needs to be able to: understand the priority levels for each task in a workflow, run the necessary steps to create tasks or adjust tasks, and set up automated workflows.
Most tools have one or two of these steps worked out. However, ClickUp has helped users consolidate up to 5+ apps using our platform! Experience AI-powered scheduling, where tasks and meetings can be easily allocated to open slots in your calendar based on priority levels. You can also set up custom automation rules via ClickUp Brain to handle routine tasks. Say goodbye to busy work!
3. Grant Assistant (Best for fast first-draft proposal generation)
Grant Assistant is an AI grant writing assistant that focuses on speed and efficiency. It’s designed to help smaller teams and small teams quickly draft proposals and find relevant funding opportunities.
If your team is short on time and resources, this tool can help you get a competitive first draft ready in minutes.
The platform’s main strength is its rapid proposal generation. You input your project details, and the AI creates a complete draft tailored to the funder’s requirements. It also includes a funder-matching feature that scans a database of grants to find opportunities that align with your mission.
Grant Assistant best features
- Rapid proposal generation: Creates complete first drafts quickly, which you can then customize for tone and length
- Automated funder matching: Discovers relevant grant opportunities based on your organization’s profile
- Built-in compliance checker: Automatically verifies word counts, required sections, and formatting to prevent simple mistakes
Grant Assistant pros and cons
Pros:
- Extremely fast drafting process saves significant time
- User-friendly interface is easy for non-technical team members to learn
- Affordable pricing is accessible for small nonprofits
Cons:
- AI-generated content can sometimes feel generic and require heavy editing
- Limited customization options for unique proposal formats
- Fewer team collaboration features than other platforms
Grant Assistant pricing
- Custom pricing
Grant Assistant ratings and reviews
- G2: Not enough reviews
- Capterra: Not enough reviews
📖 Read More: How to Edit AI Content
4. Instrumentl (Best for grant discovery and funder research)
Instrumentl is a powerful platform for finding and managing grant opportunities. While it’s less of a writing tool, its strength lies in its comprehensive grant discovery and funder research capabilities. It helps your team build a strong, strategic pipeline of opportunities so you’re always applying for the right grants.
The platform uses AI to match your organization with the most relevant funders from its extensive database. It goes beyond simple keyword matching to analyze a funder’s past giving history, typical award sizes, and geographic focus. Essentially, Instrumentl works as an AI tool for decision-making, focusing your team’s limited time and resources.
Instrumentl best features
- Intelligent grant discovery: Finds perfectly matched opportunities and scores them based on your organization’s fit
- Comprehensive funder insights: Provides detailed profiles on funders, including their giving history and priorities
- Centralized deadline and task management: Tracks all your opportunities, deadlines, and team assignments in one dashboard
Instrumentl pros and cons
Pros:
- The most comprehensive and up-to-date grant database available
- Detailed funder intelligence helps you make strategic application decisions
- Excellent tools for visualizing and managing your grant pipeline
Cons:
- Higher price point can be a barrier for very small organizations
- Focuses on discovery and tracking, with limited AI writing assistance
- The sheer number of opportunities can feel overwhelming at first
Instrumentl pricing
- 14-day free trial
- Advanced: $980 per month
- Pro: $544 per month
- Standard: $326 per month
Instrumentl ratings and reviews
- G2: 4.9/5 (100+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.9/5 (100+ reviews)
What are real-life users saying about Instrumentl?
A user review says:
🌼 Did You Know: A study from Graphite found that as of November 2024, about 50.3 % of new English-language web articles were labeled as primarily AI-generated.
5. Grantboost (Best for customizing proposals at scale)
Grantboost is an AI platform that excels at personalizing proposals for specific funders. It combines a large library of grant templates with an AI customization engine, helping your team create tailored applications without starting from scratch.
The platform’s AI analyzes your project details and the funder’s preferences to adapt templates for a perfect fit. It suggests ways to improve your narrative based on patterns from previously successful proposals. This helps you avoid submitting generic, “cookie-cutter” applications that funders can spot a mile away.
Grantboost best features
- Dynamic template library: Access hundreds of proven templates that the AI automatically customizes for your project
- Intelligent content suggestions: Receive real-time tips for improving your narrative based on what has worked for that funder in the past
- Automated budget narrative generation: Create detailed budget justifications that align perfectly with your proposal’s story
Grantboost pros and cons
Pros:
- Excellent variety of templates covers most common grant types
- Strong customization ensures proposals feel unique and tailored
- Easy to learn, allowing new team members to become productive quickly
Cons:
- Less effective for highly specialized or technical grants
- Limited project management features for post-submission tracking
- AI suggestions can occasionally miss the mark on tone
Grantboost pricing
- Free
- Pro: $19.99 per month
- Teams: $29.99 per month
Grantboost ratings and reviews
- G2: Not enough reviews
- Capterra: Not enough reviews
⚡️ Template Archive: Free Grant Proposal Template Options for Nonprofits
6. Grant Orb (Best for workflow automation and compliance checks)
Grant Orb is a grant proposal software focused on automating the administrative side of grant writing. It helps you streamline your workflow and ensure every proposal is compliant with funder requirements. If your team spends too much time on formatting and submission logistics, this tool can free you up to focus on writing.
The platform’s strength is its workflow automation. You can create custom approval processes, set up automated reminders, and track proposals through each stage. Its compliance checker automatically verifies that you’ve met all technical requirements, reducing the risk of an application being rejected for a simple mistake.
Grant Orb best features
- Automated workflow management: Set up custom workflows to guide proposals from drafting to submission automatically
- Comprehensive compliance checking: Verifies that proposals meet all technical requirements, like word counts and required attachments
- Integrated submission portal management: Navigate different grant portals from a single interface, saving time and reducing frustration
Grant Orb pros and cons
Pros:
- Excellent automation features significantly reduce manual administrative work
- Strong compliance tools minimize the risk of technical rejections
- Intuitive workflow builder is easy to use without technical skills
Cons:
- Limited AI writing assistance compared to other platforms
- Smaller database of funding opportunities
- The user interface feels less modern than some competitors
Grant Orb pricing
- Contact for pricing
Grant Orb ratings and reviews
- G2: Not enough reviews
- Capterra: Not enough reviews
👀 Did You Know: The UK’s official “Grants Statistics Bulletin 2023 to 2024” shows that the government awarded £153 billion in grants during that period—just slightly down from £156 billion the previous year. This magnitude of funding shows how big the pie is—and how much competition and process management matter when the stakes reach into the hundreds of billions. All the more inspiration to write a winning grant proposal!
7. ChatGPT (Best for flexible, general-purpose writing help)
ChatGPT is a powerful and versatile AI writing tool that can be a valuable asset for any grant writing team. While it’s not a specialized grant writing software, its ability to generate ideas, draft content, and refine language makes it a flexible and accessible option for a wide range of tasks.
You can use it to brainstorm project ideas, overcome writer’s block on a tricky section, or simplify complex technical language for a general audience. Its conversational nature allows you to ask for revisions and explore different angles, making it a great partner for creative thinking and polishing your final draft.
ChatGPT best features
- Versatile content generation: Creates content for any grant section, from executive summaries to evaluation plans
- Interactive refinement: Iterate on your writing through natural dialogue to get the perfect phrasing
- Research assistance: Helps you understand complex topics and find supporting information for your proposal
ChatGPT pros and cons
Pros:
- Extremely flexible and can handle almost any writing task
- Constantly being updated with new capabilities
- Large user community offers a wealth of tips and best practices
Cons:
- Lacks specific knowledge of grant writing conventions and funder requirements
- No built-in collaboration or project management features for teams
- Can sometimes generate inaccurate information that needs to be fact-checked
ChatGPT pricing
- ChatGPT Plus: $20 per month
- ChatGPT Team: $30 per user per month
- ChatGPT Pro: $200 per month
- ChatGPT Enterprise: Custom pricing
ChatGPT ratings and reviews
- G2: 4.7/5 (1000+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.7/5 (200+ reviews)
What are real-life users saying about ChatGPT?
A user review says:
8. Claude (Best for long-form, complex proposal editing)
Claude is an advanced AI model that excels at handling long, complex documents. This makes it particularly useful for grant writing teams working on comprehensive proposals that require deep context and narrative consistency.
If you’ve ever struggled to keep a 50-page proposal coherent, Claude can help.
Its key feature is its large context window, which means it can read and remember an entire grant proposal at once. This allows it to make suggestions that are consistent across all sections, from the introduction to the budget. It’s also skilled at analyzing arguments and suggesting ways to make your case for funding stronger.
Claude best features
- Extended context window: Works with entire grant proposals at once, ensuring narrative consistency
- Sophisticated editing and refinement: Provides detailed feedback on structure, argumentation, and clarity
- Strong analytical reasoning: Handles complex and technical proposals with a nuanced understanding
Claude pros and cons
Pros:
- Superior handling of long documents maintains quality and coherence
- Excellent at maintaining a consistent tone and voice across multiple writers
- Strong ethical framework helps ensure proposals are truthful and appropriate
Cons:
- Not specifically trained on grant writing conventions
- Limited integrations with other project management tools
- Can sometimes be overly cautious in its suggestions
Claude pricing
- Claude Pro: $20 per month
- Claude Team: $30 per month
- Claude Max: From $100 per month
- Claude Enterprise: Custom pricing
Claude ratings and reviews
- G2: 4.4/5 (60+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.6/5 (20+ reviews)
What are real-life users saying about Claude?
A user review says:
📖 Read More: Top 10 Due Date Tracking Software
9. Gemini (Best for research, fact-checking, and real-time data analysis)
Gemini, developed by Google, is an AI tool that shines in research and fact-checking. It’s deeply integrated with web search, allowing your team to pull in real-time data and statistics to build a strong, evidence-based case for your project.
This is a huge advantage for grants that require up-to-date information.
One of its unique strengths is its multi-modal capability, meaning it can understand and work with text, images, and data. You can ask it to analyze a chart from a research paper or generate a description for a project photo. For teams already using Google Workspace, Gemini integrates seamlessly with Docs, Sheets, and Slides.
Gemini best features
- Integrated web search: Accesses current data and statistics in real-time to support your claims
- Multi-modal content analysis: Works with charts, graphs, and images in addition to text
- Collaborative features in Google Workspace: Integrates smoothly with the tools your team may already be using
Gemini pros and cons
Pros:
- Excellent research capabilities ensure proposals are based on accurate, current information
- Seamless integration with Google Workspace streamlines collaboration
- Multi-modal features support proposals with diverse content types
Cons:
- Less specialized for grant writing than dedicated platforms
- Potential data privacy concerns for sensitive organizational information
- Performance can be inconsistent depending on the task
Gemini pricing
- Gemini Advanced (via Google One AI Premium): $19.99 per month
- Gemini for Google Workspace (Business Plan): $20 per user per month
- Gemini for Google Workspace (Enterprise Plan): $30 per user per month
- Gemini Enterprise: Custom pricing
Gemini ratings and reviews
- G2: 4.4/5 (250+ reviews)
- Capterra: Not enough reviews
What are real-life users saying about Gemini?
A user review says:
10. Perplexity (Best for research with verified citations)
Perplexity is an AI research tool that acts like a super-powered search engine. It’s designed to help you find accurate information and, most importantly, show you where that information came from.
For grant writing teams that need to build heavily-researched proposals, this tool is invaluable for maintaining citation integrity.
When you ask Perplexity a question, it doesn’t just give you an answer—it gives you an answer with numbered citations linked directly to the sources. This allows you to quickly verify facts and build a credible, well-supported narrative. It’s perfect for finding statistics, academic studies, and other evidence to back up your needs statement.
Perplexity best features
- Real-time web search with source attribution: Provides current information with clear citations for every claim
- Research synthesis: Combines insights from multiple sources into a coherent summary
- Citation management: Helps you track your sources and format them correctly
Perplexity pros and cons
Pros:
- Exceptional citation tracking ensures all claims are properly sourced
- Real-time information access keeps proposals current
- Clean, focused interface is great for deep research sessions
Cons:
- Limited writing assistance beyond summarizing research
- No built-in collaboration features for team writing
- Less effective for the creative or narrative sections of a proposal
Perplexity pricing
- Perplexity Pro: $20 per month
- Perplexity Max: $200 per month
- Perplexity Enterprise Pro: $40 per user per month
- Perplexity Enterprise Max: $325 per user per month
- Perplexity Education Pro: $4.99 per month
Perplexity ratings and reviews
- G2: 4.6/5 (60+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.6/5 (20+ reviews)
What are real-life users saying about Perplexity?
A user review says:
Learn how to use AI for documentation:
11. Fireflies (Best for capturing and searching meeting insights)
Fireflies is an AI meeting assistant that automatically records, transcribes, and summarizes your team’s conversations. For grant writing teams, this means every brainstorming session, funder meeting, and internal review becomes a searchable piece of content. You’ll never lose a great idea or forget a key decision again.
Imagine you had a meeting with a program officer two months ago. With Fireflies, you can simply search the transcript for ‘budget restrictions’ or ‘evaluation metrics’ to find the exact details you need for the proposal. It automatically identifies action items and creates tasks, ensuring that follow-ups are never missed.
Fireflies best features
- Automatic meeting transcription: Captures every word from your grant planning and funder meetings
- AI-powered summaries and action items: Provides concise summaries and automatically extracts tasks and decisions
- Searchable meeting archive: Creates a knowledge base of all your grant-related conversations
Fireflies pros and cons
Pros:
- Ensures no valuable ideas from meetings are forgotten
- Integrates seamlessly with major video conferencing platforms
- Creates a searchable institutional memory of grant discussions
Cons:
- It’s not a writing tool, but rather a tool for capturing information
- Requires careful handling of sensitive information discussed in meetings
- Some team members may feel uncomfortable with meetings being recorded
Fireflies pricing
- Free
- Fireflies Pro: $18 per user per month
- Fireflies Business: $29 per user per month
- Fireflies Enterprise: $39 per user per month
Fireflies ratings and reviews
- G2: 4.8/5 (800+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.8/5 (100+ reviews)
What are real-life users saying about Fireflies?
A user review says:
💡Pro Tip: If you want to boost your fundraising and donor outreach, check out the Donation Letter Template—it’s a handy resource for crafting compelling donation requests. And for compiling the kind of data and stories that makes up professional grant proposals and ongoing funder relationships, the Non-Profit Annual Report Template is a must-have.
12. Fundwriter.ai (Best for nonprofit-focused storytelling and templates)
Fundwriter.ai is a grant writing software for nonprofits, especially smaller organizations.
It understands the unique language and storytelling needs of mission-driven work. The platform is designed to help you articulate your impact and demonstrate need in a way that resonates with funders who support nonprofits.
The AI is trained on successful nonprofit proposals, so it knows how to balance data-driven evidence with compelling, emotional storytelling. It offers templates for common nonprofit grant types, like program funding and capacity building, and provides guidance on creating strong impact statements and evaluation frameworks.
Fundwriter.ai best features
- Nonprofit-specific templates: Access templates designed for the most common types of nonprofit grants
- Impact measurement framework: Helps you generate compelling impact statements and clear evaluation plans
- Budget narrative assistance: Creates detailed budget justifications that explain costs in a way funders understand
Fundwriter.ai pros and cons
Pros:
- Specifically designed for the needs and constraints of nonprofits
- Affordable pricing makes it accessible for organizations with limited budgets
- Strong focus on impact storytelling helps you connect with funders
Cons:
- Less suitable for highly technical or academic research grants
- Smaller user base means fewer community resources and tutorials
- Limited features compared to all-in-one enterprise platforms
Fundwriter.ai pricing
- 7-day free trial
- Basic: $29 per month
- Professional: $89 per month
Fundwriter.ai ratings and reviews
- G2: Not enough reviews
- Capterra: Not enough reviews
Summarize this article for me pleaseTransform Your Grant Writing Process
Grant writing doesn’t have to be a frantic scramble of documents and deadlines.
The right AI-powered tools can bring order to the chaos, helping your team write better proposals faster and with less stress. Whether your biggest challenge is finding opportunities, drafting narratives, or managing the entire process, there’s a tool that can help. 🛠️
By choosing a converged AI tool like ClickUp, you can streamline your grant process and win more funding. They handle the repetitive work, so you can focus on strategy, building relationships, and telling your organization’s unique story.
Ready to see how an all-in-one platform can revolutionize your grant writing? Get started for free with ClickUp today.
Summarize this article for me pleaseFrequently Asked Questions
What is the best AI platform for grant writing?
Some of the best AI platforms for grant writing include Grantable, Fundwriter.ai, Grantify, and ClickUp. Grantable analyzes successful applications to generate tailored drafts and offers compliance checks and collaboration tools. Fundwriter.ai is designed for nonprofits and helps create professional-quality drafts by analyzing funder guidelines. Grantify combines AI with human expertise, providing draft sections and model answers to simplify the grant writing process. ClickUp, while known for project and document management, also offers AI-powered writing assistance and customizable templates that can help teams draft, organize, and collaborate on grant proposals efficiently.
Can ChatGPT help with grant writing?
Yes, ChatGPT can assist with grant writing by generating drafts for key components such as problem statements, proposed solutions, budgets, and letters of intent. It streamlines the writing process by providing initial content and suggestions, allowing you to focus on refining and customizing your proposal for specific funders. ClickUp’s AI features can also be used to generate and refine grant content directly within your workspace.
Can ChatGPT help with grant writing?
Yes, ChatGPT can assist with grant writing by generating drafts for key components such as problem statements, proposed solutions, budgets, and letters of intent. It streamlines the writing process by providing initial content and suggestions, allowing you to focus on refining and customizing your proposal for specific funders. ClickUp’s AI features can also be used to generate and refine grant content directly within your workspace.
What is the AI agent for grant writing?
AI agents for grant writing include platforms like Grantable, Fundwriter.ai, Grantify, and ClickUp’s AI assistant. These tools use artificial intelligence to analyze guidelines, generate drafts, suggest edits, and even provide model answers based on successful applications, making the grant writing process faster and more efficient. ClickUp’s AI can help automate repetitive writing tasks, organize research, and facilitate team collaboration on grant documents.
Is there an AI tool to find grants?
Yes, there are AI tools specifically designed to help you find grants. While ClickUp is not a dedicated grant search tool, you can use its integrations and AI features to organize and track grant opportunities, deadlines, and application progress in one place, making your grant-seeking process more organized and efficient.
Everything you need to stay organized and get work done.
