SAFe vs. Scrum: Choose the Right Framework for You

Sorry, there were no results found for “”
Sorry, there were no results found for “”
Sorry, there were no results found for “”
Spotify has a unique setup: small, autonomous squads work independently, each focusing on a specific part of the product.
These squads are essentially mini-startups within Spotify, empowered to tweak, upgrade, or even overhaul their section without interrupting anything else. No waiting around—just pure, agile scrum framework in action.
Meanwhile, Philips, a global giant with cross-functional teams in hardware, software, and customer support (to name a few), has adopted SAFe, agile practices to harmonize its efforts across geographically distributed teams. Their goal is to reduce time-to-market and improve quality.
One thing is clear: Scrum or SAFe, all companies must integrate an agile framework into their workflow to smoothen operations. This blog will tackle SaFe vs. Scrum and Scrum@Scale and help you understand the similarities, differences, and factors to consider for each of the frameworks.
Scrum is a management framework that helps teams organize, collaborate, and adapt to deliver results effectively. It thrives on short work cycles (sprints), clearly defined roles, and regular feedback.
Let’s break that down with a simple example.
If you were to start a restaurant, you’ve got two ways to run the show: either you and your partner meddle in each other’s tasks, creating chaos, or you split into smaller, focused teams.
One group perfects the recipes, another handles packaging, and a third manages marketing. Each team owns its tasks, works in short cycles, meets daily to share updates, and adjusts based on taste tests and customer feedback.
| Pros | Cons |
| Flexibility: Teams can quickly adapt to changes. | Steep learning curve: Requires proper training. |
| Faster delivery: Incremental releases keep stakeholders happy. | Scaling challenges: Not ideal for large, complex projects. |
| Collaboration: Open communication improves teamwork. | Team dependency: Relies on experienced and motivated individuals. |
| Customer satisfaction: Regular updates incorporate user feedback. | Limited to small teams: Works best with 3–10 members. |
📌 Example: A gaming company uses Scrum to push weekly updates for its app, keeping players engaged with fresh features. However, when expanding to a larger multiplayer project, coordination across agile teams becomes a bottleneck, highlighting Scrum’s scaling challenges.
One word: Software teams. But there’s more.
Scrum shines in software and lean product development, startups, and smaller teams dealing with dynamic projects, unknown solutions, or frequent client feedback. It’s perfect for teams needing iterative processes to deliver results faster.
Processes:
Roles:
🌟 Fun Fact: Amazon’s Jeff Bezos coined the “two-pizza rule,” which says a Scrum team should be small enough to be fed two pizzas.
Simply put, SAFe (Scaled Agile Framework) is an Agile framework designed to help large organizations manage multiple teams working on complex projects. It’s built on three metaphorical pillars: Team, Program, and Portfolio. These pillars offer flexibility while addressing the challenges of scaling Agile practices.
When Ericsson, a global telecom leader, faced challenges managing teams across continents, they turned to SAFe.
With SAFe’s Agile Release Trains and structured governance, Ericsson achieved:
| Pros | Cons |
| Scalable: Perfect for large, distributed teams | Complex: Implementation requires significant effort and training |
| Alignment: Ensures teams work toward shared goals | Bureaucratic: Can introduce layers of oversight |
| Faster delivery: Continuous integration speeds up releases | Customization challenges: May not fit all organizational cultures |
| Improved quality: Built-in quality practices reduce defects | Overhead: Adds processes that can slow smaller teams |
| Predictability: Clear milestones improve progress tracking | Tool dependence: Relies heavily on specific tools for success |
📌 Example: A multinational manufacturing company adopted SAFe to streamline cross-functional collaboration. While they achieved better alignment and faster product delivery, the initial training phase took months, highlighting SAFe’s steep learning curve.
SAFe is ideal for large organizations that are managing cross-functional teams and complex projects.
It’s beneficial for:
🧠 Did You Know: Despite SAFe making the most sense for enterprises among other frameworks, only 26% of Agile users reported adopting SAFe.
Governance in SAFe ensures alignment and accountability through well-defined processes and metrics.
Key elements include:
Governance is a core part of Lean Portfolio Management within SAFe, and responsibilities often fall to roles like the SAFe Program Consultant (SPC) or Chief Scrum Master (CSM).
These leaders:
Also Read: Best 16 Agile Tools For Project Management
Even though they are part of the same Agile family, Scrum and SAFe cater to different needs. Let’s break them down and see how they stack up.
📀 Scrum is lightweight and thrives on small, self-organizing teams (5–9 members) working in short 2–4 week sprints. There’s no hierarchy—multiple scrum teams and their members share equal responsibility, guided by roles like the Scrum Master and Product Owner. Framework requirements include a Product Backlog, Sprint Backlog, and regular sprint cycles.
💿 SAFe, however, is built for large enterprises with multiple teams. It’s highly structured, with layers like Portfolio, Program, and Team levels to manage complex projects. SAFe requires detailed planning sessions like Program Increment (PI) Planning, and aligning work across teams over 8–12 weeks.
📌 Example:
📀 Scrum relies on three roles: Product Owner, Scrum Master, and Developer. Teams self-manage and handle dependencies through daily communication, sprint reviews, and retrospectives.
💿 SAFe introduces more specialized roles like Product Managers, System Architects, and Release Train Engineers, reflecting its focus on coordinating multiple teams. Dependencies are addressed during PI Planning and regular synchronization events to ensure smooth collaboration.
📌 Example:
📀 Scrum emphasizes frequent, incremental updates in short cycles, allowing quick adjustments based on feedback. It’s all about delivering functional pieces of the product faster.
💿 SAFe focuses on delivering integrated solutions with its longer Program Increments. Its structured delivery model ensures predictability and quality, ideal for large-scale projects.
📌 Example:
In summary:
| Aspect | Scrum | SAFe |
| Team size | Small (5–9 members) | Large (multiple teams across departments) |
| Scope | Single-team projects | Enterprise-wide coordination |
| Timeframe | 2–4 week sprints | 8–12 week Program Increments |
| Best for | Startups and small teams | Large organizations with complex projects |
“The differences that separate human beings are nothing compared to the similarities that bond us together.” Sophie Grégoire Trudeau once said this about people, but who knew it applied to agile frameworks too!
At their core, both frameworks draw from the Agile Manifesto and its principles. They prioritize:
Scrum and SAFe champion a collaborative approach, enabling teams to deliver smaller chunks of value frequently. This ensures:
So, if you’re too worried about choosing between Scrum and SAFe, you can never go too wrong.
Whether a Scrum team rolls out weekly app updates or a SAFe train delivers integrated enterprise solutions every quarter, both frameworks break down work into manageable pieces, ensuring consistent progress.
📱Scenario: Your startup is launching a new app, and you need to iterate quickly with a small team.
✅ Solution: Scrum
📌 Example: A food delivery app team uses Scrum to release weekly feature updates based on user feedback.
📱Scenario: Your enterprise has several cross-functional teams working on interconnected projects.
✅ Solution: SAFe
📌 Example: A telecom company adopts SAFe to synchronize software and hardware teams on a global scale.
📱Scenario: You’re developing a product that needs frequent customer input and quick adjustments.
✅ Solution: Scrum
📌 Example: An e-commerce company uses Scrum to tweak its user interface every sprint based on customer suggestions.
By now, it is clear that each framework serves a unique purpose.
However, choosing between Scrum and SAFe depends entirely on your team’s needs.
This is why you should ask a few questions to guide your decision-making:
Once you’ve got answers, matching your team’s needs to the right framework is easier.
If you’re having trouble deciding, you can opt for the best of both worlds. Yes, it exists!
Meet Scrum@Scale—the powerful combination of Scrum’s simplicity and SAFe’s scalability.
Here’s how it works: Scrum@Scale expands Scrum’s principles to larger organizations. Instead of piling on extra layers of hierarchy, it builds a scale-free architecture, creating networks of small, efficient teams working cohesively.
The goal? Achieve linear scalability without drowning in bureaucracy.
Think of it as minimum viable bureaucracy (MVB)—it provides just enough structure to stay organized and avoid unnecessary delays without stifling creativity or speed.
📌 Example: Imagine a global retail chain launching an omnichannel platform. Small Scrum teams handle app design, logistics integration, and customer service features. Using Scrum@Scale, these teams align on dependencies through Scaled Daily Scrums, with an Executive Action Team driving transformation and decision-making.

As Mike Cohn aptly said, “If you’re not better next month, you’re no longer agile.” While Agile frameworks promote constant improvement, collaboration, and adaptability, teams still need project management to prioritize tasks.
For continuous improvement, you need the right tools.
Start by breaking down deliverables into small, actionable tasks. Think of these as the building blocks of your Agile house.
Using user stories, you can reflect exactly what your end-users need, whether a new feature or fixing something they’ve raised issues about.
✨ In Scrum terms, this is your sprint planning. With ClickUp, you can take items from your Product Backlog, organize them into a Sprint Backlog, and get the ball rolling—no Post-it notes needed.

💜 Case Study: Sideways NYC 🤝🏻 ClickUp
One team that mastered sprint automation with ClickUp is Sideways NYC.
Let us look at their journey.
Challenge: The team wanted to move from time tracking to sprint points for a more agile approach to monitoring capacity. However, manually managing sprint schedules across teams and projects was time-consuming and prone to errors
Here’s how ClickUp helped: Using ClickUp’s Automated Sprints feature, they configured two-week cycles to start every Monday, automating the entire sprint process.
The project manager simply entered the number of cycles in the project scope, and ClickUp automatically generated all the Sprint Lists. This saved significant time and ensured consistency across teams without the need for manual updates
When managing Agile projects, ClickUp is like your project management compass.
You can outline your Agile Charter in ClickUp Docs and share it with your team without the endless email chains.
Here’s the process: Once you’ve organized your tasks, use ClickUp’s collaboration features to keep everyone in the loop. You can tag relevant team members through comments or @mentions, ensuring they get notified and can jump in when needed.
Additionally, make agile documentation a breeze by using ClickUp Brain to draft requirements for your next software iteration. Simply provide basic details about a feature’s functionality or updates, and the AI will generate key elements like outlines.

Need to keep your Scrum processes organized? ClickUp’s Kanban View offers an intuitive visual workflow that keeps everyone on the same page.

And with sub-tasks and checklists, you’ll never have to worry about forgotten steps or those pesky “small details.”
Also Read: 15 Best Software Development Tools
Agile is all about collaboration; real-time communication can make or break your team’s momentum. ClickUp’s Chat feature transforms how teams communicate by integrating conversations directly into their workflows.
Every List, Folder, and Space has its dedicated chat, allowing team members to discuss projects while having all relevant views and tasks just a click away.

Plus, you can add team members, share updates, and even make a chat private—all seamlessly tied to the corresponding workspace.
✨ With everything living in one place, you can effortlessly switch between chatting about and completing a task.
Visibility is another puzzle piece, and ClickUp Dashboards doesn’t disappoint.
With customizable dashboards, you can monitor progress, track performance, and stay on top of Agile metrics like burnup and burndown charts.

Whether it’s understanding how tasks flow through the team or spotting where things are bottlenecking, ClickUp gives you the data and insights to course-correct in real time.
Of course, tools alone aren’t enough. Adopting Agile frameworks requires support and community. ClickUp offers plenty of both, from templates and tutorials to an active user community that is happy to share tips and tricks.
And when you hit a roadblock? Their support team is always ready to guide you.
According to the Pulse of the Profession Report, 53% of IT professionals report using Agile methodologies regularly.
By now, you should have a better idea of which framework—Scrum or SAFe—is right for your organization. To stay ahead of challenges and ensure timely delivery, you need an agile project management tool that is as agile as your team.
That’s where ClickUp steps in as your all-in-one productivity powerhouse. Your work will no longer be broken.
With ClickUp, your everything app for work, get ready to unlock project management, knowledge management, and chat—all powered by AI in one platform.
Why wait? Sign up for ClickUp today and give your Agile frameworks the boost they deserve!
© 2025 ClickUp