Regrettable vs. Non-Regrettable Termination: Differences & Best Practices

Sorry, there were no results found for “”
Sorry, there were no results found for “”
Sorry, there were no results found for “”
You lose a team member and think, “Could we have done something to keep them?” That is the primary question that separates regrettable vs. non-regrettable termination
And unfortunately, it’s one HR leaders don’t ask often enough. When employees leave, it’s not always a red flag. But when the right ones walk away, it signals something deeper than just a role mismatch or a better offer.
You might notice:
The issue isn’t just about employee turnover, it’s knowing which exits are preventable, and which are overdue. That’s where this distinction helps you lead better, retain longer, and hire smarter.
Most companies focus on the number of exits. The smart ones focus on which exits they can’t afford.
Not all employee exits are the same and understanding the difference is essential for building resilient, high-performing teams.
Centralize your retention and termination strategy, from tasks to templates and everything in between.
Employee termination marks the end of an employee’s formal relationship with a company. It’s not always dramatic, but it’s always a turning point. Whether it’s a resignation from a top performer or a structured exit for an underperformer, every termination leaves a footprint on your company, your employee data, and your ability to retain the right talent.
Understanding how these exits play out helps HR teams reduce unwanted employee turnover, maintain a strong workplace culture, and make more strategic staffing decisions.
Terminations happen for all kinds of reasons and not all of them are under your organization’s control. But each one impacts your attrition rates, morale, and even long-term cost savings.
Here are some of the most common causes:
Some exits are avoidable with the right retention strategies. Others are necessary to protect performance, culture, or direction.
Here’s a breakdown to help you distinguish between voluntary and involuntary terminations and what they reveal about your organization:
| Criteria | Voluntary termination | Involuntary termination |
| Who initiates | Employee | Employer |
| Typical reasons | Career switch, relocation, burnout, lack of career growth, dissatisfaction with employee experience or job satisfaction, better offer | Poor performance, behavior issues, policy violations, downsizing, toxic company culture |
| Impact on company | This can result in regrettable attrition if high performers or valuable employees leave unexpectedly | Often seen as non-regretted attrition, but if overused, may signal poor hiring or weak performance management |
| What it signals | Gaps in employee retention, lack of support for career growth, or disengagement | Need for better hiring, training, or addressing underlying cultural issues |
| Common HR response | Improve communication tools, offer career path clarity, redesign workloads, check employee satisfaction | Audit performance processes, conduct thorough exit interviews, align policies, monitor HR metrics |
Voluntary doesn’t always mean positive. Involuntary doesn’t always mean bad. The key is tracking what patterns emerge, and whether you’re losing great employees or filtering out the wrong fits.
👀 Did You Know? Employees who leave a company and then get rehired are called boomerang employees. They often outperform new hires because they already understand the company’s culture and processes.
Before we go into the details of what each type of termination means, here’s a quick snapshot of the differences between regrettable vs. non-regrettable termination.
Some departures slow you down. Others give you room to breathe. Recognizing the difference helps your team focus on what truly matters: retaining those you can’t afford to lose, and confidently letting go of those who aren’t moving your business forward.
| Criteria | Regrettable termination | Non-regrettable termination |
| Definition | The loss of a high-performing, culturally aligned employee you wanted to retain | The exit of an employee whose performance or fit was not adding value |
| Impact on team | Creates disruption, knowledge gaps, and reduced morale among existing employees | Often improves team dynamics and reduces friction |
| Cost to the company | High; lost intellectual capital, recruiting costs, delayed projects | Low; often frees up budget or creates cost savings |
| Signal to leadership | Gaps in employee retention, career development, or support systems | Effective use of HR metrics to maintain performance standards |
| Typical root causes | Burnout, lack of professional growth, poor work-life balance, unaddressed feedback | Chronic poor performance, cultural misalignment, lack of engagement |
| Rehire likelihood | Yes, most companies would rehire if given the chance | No, typically seen as unregretted attrition |
| Best response | Review retention strategies, run thorough exit interviews, assess team health | Audit performance policies, track unregretted attrition rate, support remaining team members |
| Long-term effect | Weakens company culture and increases turnover risk if patterns continue | Strengthens team alignment and reinforces accountability |
Most HR professionals don’t get tripped up by the number of exits. The challenge is knowing which exits signal trouble and which ones show your systems are working.
When you understand the core differences between regrettable vs non-regrettable attrition, your hiring, development, and engagement strategies become more targeted, and your teams more resilient.
💡 Pro Tip: Looking for ways to engage your team and acknowledge top performers? Try these 100 Employee Appreciation Messages to Boost Engagement and Retention
And now, let’s dive into the details.
Regrettable termination refers to the voluntary or preventable exit of an employee whose contributions, performance, or potential made them an asset to the company.
Regrettable termination is a major staffing inconvenience. But more than that, these are the people others leaned on. Typically, they include your top performers, team mentors, and culture builders. When they leave, you’re left trying to recover lost momentum, employee engagement, and internal trust.
Unlike routine employee turnover, regrettable attrition is the kind that makes you pause and wonder: could this have been avoided?
📖 Also Read: Best Employee Engagement Software for Surveys & More
You can usually feel the loss when it happens and not just on paper.
Each of these exits represents regretted attrition, the kind that leaves behind more than just an empty seat. You lose intellectual capital, project continuity, and the very people who help retain others.
And when valued employees leave, it sends a signal. Not just to leadership, but to your existing employees who start wondering if they’re next.
📖 Read More: How to Conduct Stay Interviews to Retain Employees?
When regrettable attrition occurs, it cuts deeper than you think.
If you don’t take action, it snowballs and eventually impacts performance, retention, and your ability to attract top talent.
You can’t stop all exits, but you can make sure you’re not losing the ones who matter most.
Here’s what helps:
To prevent regrettable attrition, you need to anticipate it and not respond after it’s too late. The right tools, structure, and culture make the difference between staying and sending that resignation email.
Non-regrettable termination refers to the departure of an employee whose exit does not disrupt business operations, team morale, or future performance. In some cases, it may even improve them.
These exits are intentional and, more importantly, necessary. They often reflect a decision to maintain standards, protect workplace culture, and align talent with long-term goals. Unlike regrettable attrition, you don’t question whether they should have stayed—you know the team is better off without them.
And when tracked accurately, non-regrettable attrition helps separate productive departures from costly ones.
When these employees leave, the impact is either not felt at all, meaning they didn’t bring much to the table, or the impact is positive, meaning their exit brought positive changes.
Non-regrettable termination includes all forms of unregretted attrition, like departures that reduce overhead, ease collaboration, improve the workplace culture and environment, and make space for new hires who are better aligned with your team’s goals.
They’re also reminders that not all employee departures are setbacks. Some are progress.
⚡ Template Archive: Free HR Templates & Forms to Improve HR Processes
Keeping someone who repeatedly misses the mark or disrupts others while doing so, comes at a cost. Not just in output, but in energy, trust, and culture.
That’s when non-regretted attrition becomes a strategic move.
You may need to take action when:
Handled proactively, these exits support better team dynamics and make your employee retention efforts more meaningful. They also give you cleaner data: distinguishing true regretted attrition from exits that improve your overall organization’s control and momentum.
Tracking your unregretted attrition rate doesn’t mean celebrating every departure—it means knowing which exits were the right ones.
👀 Did You Know? Companies don’t just run exit interviews anymore; they’re also holding stay interviews with top performers to find out what’s working.
It’s one of the smartest ways to prevent regrettable attrition before it even starts.
Managing regrettable vs non-regrettable termination effectively means having systems in place before the resignation lands in your inbox. The key isn’t just tracking exits—it’s understanding patterns, building consistency, and acting early.
Let’s walk through how teams do this better with ClickUp.

Many HR teams deal with disconnected tools, missed feedback loops, or retention strategies that never make it past planning. Use ClickUp Tasks to assign follow-ups after exit interviews or pulse surveys so nothing falls through the cracks.
Keep career development plans, onboarding documents, and feedback rubrics centralized in ClickUp Docs. This makes them accessible and actionable for every team lead.
To stay focused on outcomes, connect engagement initiatives and attrition goals directly to ClickUp Goals. This keeps your retention efforts measurable, aligned, and visible to the people who need to drive them.
When tools talk to each other, your people stay longer.

Knowing when disengagement begins is half the battle. ClickUp helps you stay ahead by using ClickUp Forms to capture signals like misalignment, burnout, or lack of recognition. All through team pulse checks, onboarding feedback, or manager surveys.
You can even automate alerts when engagement scores drop or one-on-one meetings go repeatedly unscheduled, so HR isn’t reacting to problems too late.

When you’re managing attrition across dozens or even hundreds of roles, automation becomes essential. ClickUp Automations helps trigger timely actions like nudging managers to check in, surfacing missed checklists from onboarding, or flagging underused internal mobility programs.
This isn’t just time-saving. It’s what gives you the time to focus on strategic work like retention strategies, team design, and career path planning.
The ClickUp Employee Engagement Template gives HR teams a flexible system to improve and act on engagement insights.
You can use it to:
Pair it with the ClickUp Employee Engagement Survey Template and the Employee ClickUp Engagement Action Plan Template to close the loop between insight and action.

If you’re leading retention across a growing team, ClickUp for Human Resources lets you centralize everything: surveys, data analytics, development tracking, feedback systems, and more.
You’ll be able to:
With the right tools, you don’t just manage exits. You prevent the ones that matter most.
📖 Read More: How to Optimize Human Resource Processes?
The way HR manages retention and termination is evolving fast. As businesses navigate economic uncertainty, hybrid work models, and shifting employee expectations, workforce planning is no longer just about filling roles.
It’s about anticipating change and minimizing risk. Here’s how emerging trends are shaping the future of retention strategies and termination management:
Termination decisions are becoming more data-informed than ever. Instead of relying on performance reviews alone, HR teams are turning to data analytics to identify patterns in employee attrition across any period like sudden drops in engagement, missed development milestones, or feedback irregularities.
By tracking the average number of projects, promotions, or manager check-ins per role, leaders can forecast who’s likely to exit. And whether it’s a case of regrettable attrition or a justified outcome.
Expect this trend to grow: early warning systems and attrition dashboards will soon become the baseline, not a bonus.
AI tools are enabling HR to analyze qualitative feedback at scale. Tools that scan open-text survey responses, exit interviews, or Slack channels can flag language patterns linked to dissatisfaction, team misalignment, or even toxic company culture.
Instead of reading individual complaints, HR teams can prioritize themes like improving visibility into what’s causing turnover before it reaches critical mass.
This supports a more proactive approach to workforce management, where interventions can be deployed early, and valued employees don’t fall through the cracks.
Not all exits are a failure, some are necessary. But how you manage them is changing.
HR teams are moving toward structured, transparent offboarding frameworks that tie termination management to long-term goals. This includes:
Done right, even non-regrettable terminations can reinforce culture instead of undermining it.
More companies are shifting budgets from recruiting to internal talent development. Why?
Because internal hires are faster to onboard, easier to retain, and far less likely to contribute to regretted attrition.
Tracking blocked mobility like repeated lateral moves without promotion or lack of stretch assignments will soon be as critical as monitoring high turnover or engagement scores.
In the future, managing employee retention will be about momentum. When employees can grow, they stay.
The future of workforce retention and termination management isn’t just automated or data-rich but it is strategic.
HR leaders will need to:
Companies that adapt early will reduce their attrition rates and make better hiring, development, and exit decisions across the board.
Whether you’re facing high turnover, evaluating retention strategies, or tracking the number of employees across a time period, one truth holds: not all exits are equal.
Understanding the difference between regrettable vs non-regrettable termination gives you more than just clarity. It helps you minimize regrettable attrition, avoid costly regrettable turnover, and protect your workplace culture. With the right systems, you also improve good communication and reduce the negative impact of poorly managed transitions.
Try ClickUp today to manage employees, track attrition rates, and build a system where your career development opportunities and termination policies work in sync.
© 2025 ClickUp