9 Best Augmentcode Alternatives for Teams in 2026

Most developers picking an AI coding assistant focus on autocomplete speed or chat quality, but the real bottleneck isn’t writing code faster. It’s the constant context switching between your IDE, task tracker, documentation, and communication tools that kills momentum. Every toggle between applications scatters critical information and breaks your flow state.

This guide breaks down 9 Augment Code alternatives, from IDE-native tools like GitHub Copilot and Cursor to workflow-spanning platforms like ClickUp that connect your code to the full story of why you’re building it. The goal isn’t just faster autocomplete. It’s finding the right tool for how your team actually works.

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

Why Go for Augment Code Alternatives

Augment Code is an AI-powered coding assistant designed to understand large, enterprise-scale codebases and provide context-aware suggestions. It’s built for developers working across sprawling repositories where generic AI tools lose context. But not every team needs that level of codebase indexing, and some developers find Augment’s IDE support or workflow integration doesn’t match their stack.

Many developers want deeper chat-based interactions, better inline completions, or tools that work across their entire tech ecosystem—not just the IDE. Here are the most common reasons teams explore alternatives:

• IDE flexibility: Some tools offer broader editor support or work as standalone applications
• Workflow integration: Developers may need an AI-powered coding assistant that connects to project management, documentation, or CI/CD pipelines
• Context scope: Different tools handle codebase context differently—some excel at single-file suggestions, others at cross-repo understanding
• Team collaboration: Enterprise teams may need features like code review assistance, knowledge sharing, or centralized AI management

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

Augment Code Alternatives at a Glance

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

The Best Augment Code Alternatives to Use

1. ClickUp (best for AI-powered development workflow management)

Development teams often struggle with tool sprawl where code lives in the IDE, tasks in one tool, documentation in another, and communication scattered across platforms. This fragmentation slows down shipping, creates blind spots, and leaves developers wondering why they’re building a feature, not just how.

ClickUp eliminates this work sprawl as a converged AI workspace that connects your entire development workflow. Unlike standalone coding assistants that only see your code, ClickUp provides the full context of what you’re building and why.

And if you want AI that ships code, not just suggests it, ClickUp Brain Agents can help you go from task to implementation faster. For example, ClickUp’s Codegen agent can use the task context to generate code and help move work toward a PR workflow, so execution stays connected to the requirements and decisions that shaped it.

With ClickUp Brain, AI assistance runs across your workspace. You can @mention Brain in a task comment or ClickUp Chat, and it responds using knowledge from your tasks, docs, and conversations. Ask it to summarize sprint progress, draft technical specs from task descriptions, or surface related documentation instantly, so you spend less time chasing context and more time shipping.

Then, ClickUp Automations handle the manual updates that interrupt deep work. Trigger workflows from development events. When a pull request merges, automatically move the linked task to Done and notify the right people. When a bug is filed, assign it based on component or ownership. That’s fewer status pings, fewer “did anyone update this?” moments, and fewer drive-by context switches.

Finally, ClickUp Docs keeps technical documentation connected to the work it describes. Create API references, architecture decisions, or onboarding guides that link directly to relevant ClickUp Tasks, so when requirements change, the affected docs and tasks surface together.

Best features

• AI-powered code generation with Codegen agent: Go beyond code suggestions—ClickUp’s Codegen agent uses the full context of your tasks to generate production-ready code and move work toward a pull request. This keeps implementation tightly connected to requirements and decisions, reducing handoff errors and speeding up delivery
• Workspace-wide AI assistance with ClickUp Brain: Instantly access knowledge from tasks, docs, and conversations by @mentioning Brain in comments or chat. Summarize sprint progress, draft technical specs, or surface related documentation in seconds, so developers spend less time searching and more time building
• Flexible, event-driven automations: Automate manual updates and repetitive tasks by triggering workflows from development events. For example, when a pull request merges, ClickUp can automatically move the linked task to Done, notify stakeholders, or assign follow-up actions—minimizing context switching and keeping everyone aligned
• Docs that stay connected to your workflow: Create and maintain technical documentation (like API references or architecture decisions) that links directly to relevant tasks. When requirements change, affected docs and tasks surface together, ensuring your team always works from the latest information
• Unified, converged workspace: Eliminate tool sprawl by managing code, tasks, docs, and communication in one place. ClickUp’s converged AI workspace gives your team a complete, real-time view of what’s being built and why, reducing blind spots and accelerating collaboration

Pros:

• Unified context from tasks, docs, and conversations gives developers a complete picture of project requirements
• Flexible automation adapts to any workflow with custom triggers and chained actions
• All-in-one workspace eliminates the fragmentation that scatters team knowledge across multiple platforms

Cons:

• Learning curve for teams new to all-in-one platforms
• Mobile app has fewer features than desktop
• Some advanced automations require time to configure

Pricing

Ratings and Reviews:

• G2: 4.7/5 (9,000+ reviews)
• Capterra: 4.6/5 (4,000+ reviews)

Here’s what a G2 reviewer has to say about ClickUp.

2. GitHub Copilot (best for developers embedded in the GitHub ecosystem)

For developers who already live in GitHub, the constant friction of switching tools to ask questions or review pull requests can be a major drag on productivity. GitHub Copilot solves this by bringing AI assistance directly into your existing workflow, with developers using Copilot finishing tasks 35% faster than those without it. It suggests code as you type, answers questions in chat, and helps with pull request reviews—all without leaving your editor.

Copilot uses large language models trained on public code to provide inline suggestions. It understands context from your current file, open tabs, and repository structure. The chat interface lets you ask questions about your codebase or request explanations of unfamiliar code, making it a powerful programming AI assistant.

Best features:

• Inline code suggestions: As you type, Copilot offers completions ranging from single lines to entire functions. It learns from your coding patterns and the surrounding context, often anticipating what you need before you finish typing
• Copilot Chat: Ask questions in natural language directly in your IDE. Request explanations of complex code, ask for refactoring suggestions, or have it generate unit tests
• Pull request assistance: Copilot can generate PR descriptions, summarize changes for reviewers, and suggest improvements. This speeds up the review cycle and ensures PRs have meaningful context for teammates

Pros:

• Deep GitHub integration means suggestions often align with your project’s conventions
• Broad IDE support including VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, and Neovim
• Continuous improvement with regular updates and new features

Cons:

• Suggestions occasionally include deprecated patterns or outdated APIs
• Limited customization for enterprise-specific coding standards
• Requires a GitHub account and subscription

Pricing

• Free
• Pro: $10/month
• Pro+: $39/month
• Business: $19/user/month
• Enterprise: $39/user/month

Ratings and reviews

• G2: 4.5/5 (200+ reviews)
• Capterra: 4.6/5 (30+ reviews)

Here’s what a G2 reviewer has to say about GitHub Copilot.

3. Cursor (best for developers wanting an AI-native IDE experience)

Tired of AI feeling like a bolt-on to your editor? Unlike extensions, Cursor is an AI-first IDE built from the ground up. It’s a fork of VS Code, so the interface is familiar, but AI capabilities are woven into every interaction, making it one of the best AI coding assistants.

Cursor’s main advantage is its ability to index your entire codebase, enabling questions and edits that span multiple files. Ask it to “refactor the authentication flow,” and it understands which files are involved. This whole-project awareness prevents the common frustration of AI breaking things it can’t see.

Best features:

• Codebase-wide context: Cursor indexes your entire project, so AI interactions understand relationships between files. This holistic view prevents the “AI doesn’t understand my project” frustration
• Composer: Describe what you want in plain English, and Composer implements changes across multiple files. This is a game-changer for refactoring tasks that would take hours manually
• Predictive editing: Cursor anticipates your next change based on recent edits. If you’re renaming a variable in one place, it suggests the same rename elsewhere

Pros:

• True codebase understanding reduces suggestions that break other parts of your code
• Familiar VS Code interface means a minimal learning curve
• Supports multiple AI models to balance speed and capability

Cons:

• Requires switching from your current IDE
• Codebase indexing can be slow on very large repositories
• Some VS Code extensions may not work perfectly

Pricing

• Hobby
• Pro: $20/month
• Pro+: $60/month
• Ultra: $200/month
• Teams: $40/user/month
• Enterprise: Custom

Ratings and reviews

• G2: Not enough reviews
• Capterra: Not enough reviews

Here’s what a G2 reviewer has to say about Cursor.

4. Amazon Q Developer (best for teams building on AWS)

If your infrastructure runs on AWS, you know the pain of trying to get a generic AI tool to understand the nuances of IAM policies or Lambda configurations. Amazon Q Developer is an AI assistant that speaks AWS natively. It goes beyond simple code completion to help with architecture decisions, security scanning, and even migrating legacy applications.

Because it’s built by Amazon, Q Developer understands the relationships between AWS services and can recommend best practices specific to your architecture. It can suggest IAM policies, help configure Lambda functions, and explain CloudFormation templates.

Best features:

• AWS service expertise: Ask how to configure an S3 bucket policy or optimize a DynamoDB query. Suggestions follow AWS best practices and account for service-specific nuances
• Code transformation: Migrating a legacy Java application? Q Developer can analyze your codebase and guide the upgrade process, handling dependency updates and API changes
• Security scanning: Built-in security scanning scans your code against known security issues and AWS standards, with suggestions for fixes

Pros:

• Native AWS understanding prevents common configuration mistakes
• Enterprise features allow training on internal codebases and standards
• Broad language support including Python, Java, and JavaScript

Cons:

• Most valuable for AWS-heavy environments
• Some features require AWS account integration
• IDE support is more limited than some competitors

Pricing

• Free tier
• Pro tier: $19/user/month

Ratings and reviews

• G2: 4.6/5 (30+ reviews)
• Capterra: Not enough reviews

Here’s what a G2 reviewer has to say about Amazon Q Developer.

5. Tabnine (best for enterprises prioritizing code privacy)

Sending proprietary code to a third-party server is a non-starter for many enterprises. This concern over data privacy often blocks the adoption of powerful AI coding tools—57% of IT professionals at enterprises that haven’t adopted generative AI cite data privacy concerns as their #1 inhibitor. Tabnine directly addresses this pain point with its privacy-first approach.

Tabnine offers on-premise deployment, meaning your code never leaves your infrastructure. For enterprises with strict data policies or those in regulated industries, this is a critical feature. Even its cloud-hosted version offers a zero data retention policy, ensuring your code isn’t stored or used for training other models.

Best features:

• On-premise deployment: Run Tabnine entirely within your own infrastructure. This satisfies security requirements that prohibit external AI services and supports air-gapped environments
• Personalized models: Tabnine learns from your codebase to provide suggestions that match your team’s patterns, naming conventions, and architectural decisions
• Zero data retention: For cloud deployments, Tabnine’s policy means your code isn’t stored after processing, providing AI assistance without the data privacy concerns

Pros:

• Enterprise-grade privacy features get approval from security and compliance teams
• Promotes team-wide consistency by suggesting code that follows your standards
• Broad IDE support works across VS Code, JetBrains, Vim, and more

Cons:

• On-premise deployment requires infrastructure management
• Personalization requires time to train on your codebase
• Some advanced features are limited to enterprise tiers

Pricing

• Tabnine Agentic Platform: $59/user/month (annual subscription)

Ratings and reviews

• G2: 4.1/5 (40+ reviews)
• Capterra: Not enough reviews

Here’s what a Capterra reviewer has to say about Tabnine.

📮 ClickUp Insight: 22% of our respondents still have their guard up when it comes to using AI at work. Out of the 22%, half worry about their data privacy, while the other half just aren’t sure they can trust what AI tells them.

ClickUp tackles both concerns head-on with robust security measures and by generating detailed links to tasks and sources with each answer. This means even the most cautious teams can start enjoying the productivity boost without losing sleep over whether their information is protected or if they’re getting reliable results.

Try ClickUp for free

6. Sourcegraph Cody (best for navigating massive enterprise codebases)

Enterprise codebases can span thousands of repositories, making it nearly impossible for a developer to understand how everything connects. Generic AI tools often fail at this scale. Cody, built by the code search company Sourcegraph, leverages its powerful search infrastructure to provide AI assistance that actually understands your entire codebase.

Cody builds on Sourcegraph’s years of experience indexing code, allowing it to answer questions that cross repository boundaries. Ask how a service is called, and Cody finds every usage across your organization, not just in the current repo.

Best features:

• Enterprise code search integration: Cody leverages Sourcegraph’s code intelligence to understand relationships across thousands of repositories
• Multi-repo context: Unlike tools limited to a single repository, Cody can pull context from multiple repos simultaneously when working on interconnected services
• Customizable LLM backends: Enterprises can choose the AI model that fits their needs—Claude, GPT-4, or others—based on capability, cost, or compliance requirements

Pros:

• Unmatched codebase scale for organizations with hundreds of repositories
• Answers link back to actual code, allowing developers to verify suggestions
• Enterprise controls for managing access, monitoring usage, and configuring context

Cons:

• Full capabilities require a Sourcegraph deployment
• Setup can be complex for organizations new to Sourcegraph
• Some features require enterprise licensing

Pricing

• Cody Free
• Cody Pro: $9/user/month

Ratings and reviews

• G2: 4.5/5 (90 reviews)
• Capterra: Not found

Here’s what a Gartner reviewer has to say about Sourcegraph Cody.

📹 Stop writing and rewriting code manually.
This video breaks down five AI agents that make coding faster, cleaner, and a lot less frustrating.

7. Windsurf (best for developers wanting autonomous AI agents)

Most AI coding tools just offer suggestions, leaving you to do the actual work. Windsurf takes a different approach, moving beyond suggestions into autonomous task completion. Its agentic AI can handle multi-step coding tasks, shifting your role from writer to reviewer.

You describe a goal, and its Cascade feature figures out the steps. Windsurf also offers Flows, which are pre-built agentic workflows for common tasks like adding features or fixing bugs. The AI handles the planning and execution, checking in with you when decisions are needed.

To understand how AI agents are transforming the coding landscape, watch this overview of AI agents for coding and their practical applications in development workflows.

Best features:

• Cascade: Describe a multi-step task like “Add user authentication with OAuth,” and Cascade breaks it down and executes it with your approval at key checkpoints
• Flows: Pre-built workflows for common development tasks that generate code, tests, and documentation, accelerating repetitive patterns
• Deep codebase indexing: Windsurf indexes code, comments, and project configuration, so its autonomous actions account for your project’s conventions

Pros:

• True autonomous capability can execute multi-step tasks
• Thoughtful checkpoints keep you in control without micromanaging
• A trial period lets you evaluate agentic workflows before committing

Cons:

• Agentic features require a level of trust in the AI’s decision-making
• As a newer tool, it has a smaller community than established options
• Complex tasks may still require manual intervention

Pricing

• Free
• Pro: $15/month
• Teams: $30/user/month
• Enterprise: Custom

Ratings and reviews

• G2: Not enough reviews
• Capterra: Not enough reviews

Here’s what a G2 reviewer has to say about Windsurf.

8. Qodo (best for teams focused on code quality and testing)

Writing code fast is one thing; writing reliable code is another. While most AI tools focus on speed, Qodo (formerly CodiumAI) focuses on code quality. Its strength is in generating tests, analyzing code quality, and improving pull requests.

Qodo analyzes your code and generates meaningful test cases, including edge cases that developers often miss. It understands the code’s behavior and creates tests that actually verify it works correctly. This focus on quality is a key differentiator in the crowded Augment Code vs. Cursor space.

Best features:

• AI test generation: Qodo analyzes your functions and generates comprehensive test suites, identifying edge cases, boundary conditions, and error scenarios
• Pull request analysis: Before human review, Qodo scans PRs for potential issues like code smells or areas lacking test coverage, making human reviews more productive
• Code quality insights: Beyond tests, Qodo provides feedback on code structure, complexity, and maintainability to help you write cleaner code

Pros:

• Focuses on generating better, more reliable code, not just more code
• Generated tests verify behavior, not just achieve coverage metrics
• Integrates naturally into the code review workflow

Cons:

• Narrower focus than general-purpose coding assistants
• Test generation quality can vary by language and framework
• Some features require team or enterprise plans

Pricing

• Developer: Free
• Teams: $38/user/month
• Enterprise: Custom

Ratings and reviews

• G2: 4.8/5 (60+ reviews)
• Capterra: Not found

Here’s what a G2 reviewer has to say about Qodo.

9. Replit Ghostwriter (best for developers who code in the browser)

Setting up a local development environment can be a hassle. Replit is a cloud-based IDE where you write, run, and deploy code entirely in your browser, and Ghostwriter is its integrated AI assistant.

Because Ghostwriter lives inside Replit, it understands your project’s runtime environment, dependencies, and deployment configuration. Suggestions account for what’s actually installed and available, reducing “works on my machine” problems. Replit’s real-time collaborative coding means Ghostwriter can assist an entire team simultaneously.

Best features:

• Integrated cloud environment: No local setup required—start coding with AI assistance immediately from any device
• Instant deployment awareness: Ghostwriter can help with the full lifecycle, from coding to configuring deployments and troubleshooting runtime issues
• Real-time collaboration: Multiple developers can code together in Replit, with Ghostwriter assisting everyone, making it great for pair programming

Pros:

• Zero setup means you can start coding immediately
• Full-stack awareness of both code and its runtime environment
• The integrated environment is popular for learning to code

Cons:

• Tied to Replit’s browser-based environment
• Less suitable for large, complex projects
• Requires an internet connection for all coding

Pricing

• Starter: Free
• Replit Core: $20/month (per month, billed annually)
• Teams: $35/user/month (billed annually)
• Enterprise: Custom

Ratings and reviews

• G2: 4.5/5 (280+ reviews)
• Capterra: 4.4/5 (150+ reviews)

Here’s what a Capterra reviewer has to say about Replit Ghostwriter.

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

Connect Your Code to Your Workflow

The right AI coding assistant depends on your specific context—your IDE, codebase scale, and privacy needs. There’s no single “best” tool, but there is a best tool for your situation. Teams on AWS should evaluate Amazon Q Developer, while enterprises with strict data policies should look at Tabnine.

But AI coding assistants are evolving. The tools that win will be those that understand not just code, but the full context of why you’re writing it—the tasks, the requirements, and the team collaboration that drives decisions. That’s where converged workspaces that connect AI across your entire workflow become essential.

Connect your code to the tasks, docs, and conversations that give it meaning. Get started for free with ClickUp and see how a converged workspace transforms your development workflow.

Everything you need to stay organized and get work done.

Sign Up Contact Sales