10 Microsoft Access Alternatives and Competitors 2026

Microsoft Access is officially on life support, and Microsoft is methodically pulling the plugs.

With the retirement of Office 2016 and 2019 in 2025, and Access 2021 following suit in October 2026, teams running these older versions are officially operating without a safety net.

While the company says the apps may continue to function, they will no longer receive timely security patches, bug fixes, or technical support.

Access 2024 is still available, and supported Microsoft 365 editions include it. But, if you notice that the database has become hard to share, tied to Windows, difficult to maintain, or dependent on years of VBA code, you need this list of alternatives.

The 10 tools below are ranked by how much of Microsoft Access they can replace, from the database itself to forms, reporting, and workflow logic.

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

Microsoft Access Alternatives at a Glance

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

Why Do People Leave Microsoft Access?

Teams usually start looking elsewhere when Access becomes harder to share, maintain, or extend. The pressure usually shows up in five places: concurrency, file size, maintenance, platform access, and the amount of business logic tied to one application. In more detail:

• More people need to use the same database. An Access database can support up to 255 concurrent users, but that published ceiling doesn’t describe how a busy shared application feels in practice. As more people open, edit, and write to the same file, reliability and maintenance become harder to manage
• The file keeps growing. An .accdb file can’t exceed 2 GB. Deleted records don’t immediately shrink the file either, which is why Compact and Repair become part of routine maintenance
• The original builder is gone. Access databases often accumulate forms, queries, reports, macros, and VBA over years. Once the builder leaves, even a small change can require reverse-engineering the whole application. A 2025 Saritasa survey found that 62% of organizations still rely on legacy software, with shrinking institutional knowledge adding to the problem
• The team needs browser or mobile access. Access doesn’t run natively on macOS and doesn’t offer a full browser-based version of the desktop application. That becomes a constraint when people need to enter or check data away from a Windows PC
• Too much of the application depends on Access-specific features. The tables may be easy to move, but the forms, reports, queries, macros, and VBA often aren’t. That turns a database migration into an application rebuild

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

What to Look for in a Microsoft Access Alternative

The shortlist gets easier once you separate the database from everything built around it. Before comparing products, check whether the new tool can handle the forms, reports, relationships, automations, limits, and access controls your current setup depends on.

• Data entry: Check for required fields, validation, conditional logic, and role-based views. If staff spend much of the day in Access forms, the new tool needs to support that same input flow
• Report output: Confirm that the tool can produce grouped totals, PDFs, print-ready layouts, and scheduled email reports if those are part of the current process
• Relational structure: Check how the tool handles one-to-many relationships, foreign keys, and referential integrity. Linked records may look similar on screen while behaving very differently underneath
• VBA and macros: Inventory every macro and VBA routine before migration. Map each one to an automation, formula, integration, or scheduled job, and flag anything that will need custom work
• Data limits: Compare row counts, attachment volume, storage use, and API needs with the tool’s limits before moving data
• Permissions and audit controls: Check who can view, edit, export, and administer data, and whether the system records those changes clearly enough for your team to review later

Governance deserves its own check because low-code and no-code systems can make it easy to rebuild an Access application quickly without improving its controls.

A CIO article cited Mark Driver, then a research director at Gartner, on the governance gap in low-code tools:

Also note, moving from an old Access file to a cloud tool doesn’t automatically fix governance. You still need clear permissions, ownership, and auditability around the new system.

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

The 10 Best Microsoft Access Alternatives

Here are 10 Microsoft Access alternatives worth considering, depending on whether you need stronger data handling, better forms, easier collaboration, or a more modern workflow.

1. LibreOffice Base (Best for a free, offline Access-style database)

LibreOffice Base keeps the classic desktop-database model intact, much like Microsoft Access. Tables, queries, forms, and reports live in one application across Windows, macOS, and Linux. You can define relationships, build queries visually or in SQL, and create forms with list boxes, buttons, and subforms.

Base can also connect to MySQL, PostgreSQL, and other servers through JDBC or ODBC. In that setup, Base stays as the front end while the records live on a database server built for concurrent access. Smaller databases can use the embedded engine and keep everything inside a single .odb file.

The Report Builder groups records, calculates totals, sorts results, and controls the page layout. Because Base ships with LibreOffice, Writer can pull those records into mail merges, while Calc can read them directly into a spreadsheet.

Standout features

• Access2Base: Use a LibreOffice Basic library modeled on the Microsoft Access object model, with support for forms, controls, queries, tables, and recordsets
• Macro and script support: Automate repetitive database work with LibreOffice Basic and other supported scripting options
• Open-source extensions: Add functionality through LibreOffice extensions or customize the application without depending on a proprietary database platform

Pricing

• LibreOffice (Base included): Free and open source

Ratings

• G2: Not enough reviews
• Capterra: Not enough reviews

A user review says:

Where it taps out: Moving an existing Access application takes more work than the similar desktop layout suggests. Tables come across, and queries convert to views. Forms, reports, and VBA need a rebuild, and shared editing gets harder to manage as more people work in the same setup.

2. Microsoft Dataverse and Power Apps (Best for modernizing Access inside Microsoft 365)

Dataverse and Power Apps are Microsoft’s cloud route for teams that want their data, identity, and application layer inside the same ecosystem. Microsoft can move existing tables into Dataverse while the desktop front end stays connected during the rebuild.

Dataverse holds the data, while Power Apps turns it into a working application. The same records can feed Power BI, Power Automate, Dynamics 365, and Teams, which keep reporting, automation, and collaboration inside the wider Microsoft stack.

IT also gets more control over the new setup. Dataverse supports role-based permissions, business rules, and centrally managed data. For orgs already using Microsoft Entra and Power Platform, admins can manage much of that access through tools they already know.

Power Apps also brings Copilot into the build process. You can describe the app or data structure you need in natural language and use the generated result as a starting point. Model-driven apps offer a more structured route, while canvas apps give teams more freedom over layout and interaction.

Standout features

• Business process flows: Guide users through defined stages and required steps inside model-driven apps
• Custom offline profiles: Choose which tables and records stay available on mobile devices when there’s no connection
• Native mobile deployment: Run apps through Power Apps Mobile or package them for a more dedicated mobile experience

Pricing

• Power Apps Premium: $20/user/month
• Power Apps Premium, 2,000-seat minimum: $12/user/month
• Power Apps Developer Plan: Free for development and testing
• Dataverse database capacity: 250 MB per Premium user, pooled at the tenant level
• Additional Dataverse database capacity: $40/GB/month

Ratings

• G2: 4.3/5 (570+ reviews) for Microsoft Power Apps
• Capterra: 4.5/5 (40+ reviews) for Microsoft Power Apps

A Reddit user said:

Where it taps out: The move gets the data into Dataverse, but the Access app around that data still needs work. Forms and reports have to be rebuilt in Power Apps. VBA has to be rewritten as Power Fx or flows. Float, attachment, and multivalued columns need manual prep before they’ll migrate. A simple-looking move can turn into a broader rebuild, so test with real record counts first.

3. ClickUp (Best for replacing an Access tracker with a shared workflow)

ClickUp makes the most sense when a database does more than store information. Think of a service request, an inventory update, or an approval flow with an assigned owner, defined statuses, and clear next steps.

That information gets a familiar grid to work from with ClickUp Table View. Each row is a task, while ClickUp Custom Fields store the dates, numbers, dropdowns, locations, files, and other details attached to it. You still get the clarity of rows and columns, but the owner, status, files, and activity stay attached to the record.

ClickUp Forms handle the intake side. A submission becomes a task with critical data already mapped into its fields, which works well for requests, applications, issue reports, and other processes that would otherwise begin with manual data entry.

From there, automations or Super Agents can assign an owner, update a status, send a reminder, or route the task when something changes. That’s what separates ClickUp from a conventional database tracker. The record can move through the process without someone repeatedly deciding what happens next.

Standout features

• Custom Relationships: Connect records across Lists, such as customers to orders, accounts to service requests, or assets to maintenance work
• Formula Fields: Calculate values from other fields using mathematical functions and conditional logic
• Field-level permissions: Control who can edit individual Custom Fields when sensitive or operational data shouldn’t be open to everyone

Pricing

Ratings

• G2: 4.6/5 (14,300+ reviews)
• Capterra: 4.6/5 (4,600+ reviews)

A G2 user said:

Where it taps out: ClickUp’s relationships are built for connected work records. They don’t enforce foreign keys, transactional rules, or the kind of complex joins you’d expect from a relational database engine. An Access application with heavy SQL logic will still need a proper database behind it.

4. Airtable (Best for moving an Access database into a cloud spreadsheet-style workspace)

Open Airtable for the first time, and the spreadsheet resemblance is obvious. Under that familiar grid is a relational model that can connect records across tables.

A Customer table can link to Orders, for example, while lookup fields bring customer details into the order without copying them into another table. Airtable supports one-to-one, one-to-many, and many-to-many relationships, which cover the structure behind plenty of smaller business databases.

Forms handle new records, while Interface Designer gives people a cleaner way to view and update existing ones without opening the entire base. That makes the underlying tables less intimidating for teams that only need to work with a specific part of the data.

Airtable Sync covers the systems around that database. It can pull data from other Airtable bases and supported external sources, while higher plans add two-way and multi-source sync for workflows where records still need to move between platforms.

Standout features

• Conditional rollups and lookups: Apply conditions before Airtable counts, looks up, or rolls up linked records, which gives you finer control over calculations across related tables
• Scripting and extensions: Add custom logic or utilities when formulas and built-in automations don’t cover the process
• Field agents: Use Airtable AI inside fields to classify records, extract information, summarize text, or generate structured values

Pricing

• Free
• Team: $20/user/month, billed annually
• Business: $45/user/month, billed annually
• Enterprise Scale: Custom pricing

Ratings

• G2: 4.6/5 (3,200+ reviews)
• Capterra: 4.6/5 (2,200+ reviews)

A G2 user said:

Where it taps out: Airtable handles dashboards and on-screen views well. Paginated reports with grouped totals and fixed page layouts usually need another reporting step, like an extension or an export to Excel. Costs can also rise once a larger group needs edit access.

5. Ninox (Best for Mac teams building custom business databases)

Ninox keeps tables, forms, relationships, formulas, and reports inside one database workspace. It runs in the browser and through native apps for macOS, iOS, iPadOS, and Android, with offline support in the installed apps.

For Mac teams, that removes one persistent headache. A database built around desktop forms and records no longer needs a Windows VM just to stay usable.

Ninox Script carries the business logic. Scripts can react to record changes, validate data, create related records, and run follow-up actions. Transaction blocks can group several operations together, and installed apps can continue processing local transactions when the connection drops.

The database doesn’t have to remain self-contained either. A REST API connects Ninox with outside systems, while Make and n8n handle broader workflows. Records can also feed directly into generated contracts, invoices, and reports.

Standout features

• Reusable modules: Package tables, scripts, and related logic into modules that can be reused across other database solutions
• Multiple interfaces per database: Build separate interfaces around the same underlying data and remap fields where each interface needs a different presentation
• Process monitoring: Inspect running processes when scripts and background activity become harder to troubleshoot from the front end alone

Pricing

• Free
• Team: $31/user/month, billed annually
• Business: $49/user/month, billed annually
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Ratings

• G2: 4.7/5 (360+ reviews)
• Capterra: 4.7/5 (190+ reviews)

A G2 user said:

Where it taps out: Ninox stays approachable while the database is mostly forms, relationships, and formulas. Once a solution leans heavily on Ninox Script, custom integrations, and complex business rules, changes start to depend on someone who understands the code behind it.

6. Claris FileMaker (Best for custom business apps with forms and reports)

FileMaker is built for databases that have grown into full business applications. The data model, entry screens, scripts, and print-ready reports share the same environment. FileMaker Pro runs natively on Windows and macOS and is developed by Claris, an Apple subsidiary.

Its layout tools can group records, calculate subtotals and grand totals, add headers and footers, and control how each page prints. Finished reports can go directly to PDF or Excel, which makes FileMaker particularly relevant when formal documents are still part of the workflow.

The same application can run on iPhone and iPad through FileMaker Go or in a browser through WebDirect. Existing SQL infrastructure can stay in place, too. External SQL Sources give FileMaker live access to Microsoft SQL Server, MySQL, and Oracle data, and scripts can work with those records alongside local tables.

FileMaker 2026 also adds platform-level AI, including LLM connections, semantic search, RAG workflows, and support for Google Gemini.

Standout features

• Native mobile capture: FileMaker Go can scan barcodes, capture signatures, collect photos and audio, and work with other iPhone and iPad capabilities directly from a record
• Field-level privilege sets: Control access down to individual fields and combine those rules with Claris ID or external identity providers such as Okta and Microsoft Active Directory
• Server-side scripts: Run automation on FileMaker Server or FileMaker Cloud without keeping a desktop client open

Pricing

FileMaker Cloud

• Starter: $22/user/month, billed annually
• Max: $45/user/month, billed annually

FileMaker Server

• Starter: $17.50/user/month, billed annually
• Max: $22/user/month, billed annually

Ratings

• G2: 4.5/5 (570+ reviews)
• Capterra: 4.3/5 (200+ reviews)

A G2 user said:

Where it taps out: FileMaker can become quite proprietary once the app relies heavily on custom layouts, scripts, and .fmp12 files. The deeper the build goes, the harder it becomes to move that application logic somewhere else later.

7. Baserow (Best for keeping database infrastructure under your control)

Baserow lets you decide where the database lives. You can use Baserow Cloud and leave the infrastructure to the vendor, or run the open-source version on your own servers. Self-hosting can sit inside a private cloud, an on-premises network, or even an air-gapped environment when data residency rules are strict.

Tables hold the records, and Link-to-table fields connect related data. Lookups can pull values across those links, while rollups handle totals, averages, counts, and other calculations.

Forms handle both new submissions and edits. You can require fields, apply conditional logic, and prefill known values before someone opens the form. Baserow can also generate a secure edit link for an existing row, loading the current values and writing any changes back to that same record.

For migration, Baserow imports CSV, Excel, JSON, XML, and pasted spreadsheet data. New-table imports currently support up to 5,000 rows at a time, so you may need to split larger exports into batches.

Standout features

• Restricted views: Give someone access to a filtered subset of rows and fields while keeping the rest of the table hidden
• Record selector: Application Builder can search and paginate through linked records, keeping relationship fields usable when a table contains thousands of rows
• Kuma AI: Generate tables, fields, relationships, formulas, and apps from natural-language prompts. Self-hosted teams can also choose which AI provider processes their data

Pricing

Baserow Cloud

• Free
• Premium: $10/user/month, billed annually
• Advanced: $18/user/month, billed annually
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Baserow Self-hosted

• Open source
• Premium: $10/user/month, billed annually
• Advanced: $18/user/month, billed annually
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Ratings

• G2: Not enough reviews
• Capterra: 4.7/5 (60+ reviews)

A G2 user said:

Where it taps out: Self-hosting gives you control, but your team owns the operational work. Updates, backups, monitoring, recovery, and capacity planning are all on you. The managed cloud removes that burden, though its row limits can become a constraint as tables grow.

8. Grist (Best for spreadsheet-style data with Python formulas and granular access rules)

Grist keeps the spreadsheet as the working surface while adding relational tables and Python beneath it. Rows and columns stay familiar, but references and summary tables add structure to the data.

Formulas can use familiar spreadsheet functions or Python 3.11 with access to the standard library. A calculation that once needed a separate VBA function can live directly in the column where its result belongs. Grist runs that code inside a sandbox without persistent filesystem or internet access.

Reference and Reference List columns connect records across tables and support one-to-one, one-to-many, and many-to-many structures. Summary tables can then group those records for totals and analysis, much like a pivot table or SQL GROUP BY.

Access rules can target tables, rows, and columns. When those conditions overlap, the restriction can reach a single cell. For example, an employee directory could live in one document, while each person sees only the records they’re permitted to access.

Standout features

• Trigger formulas: Run formulas when a record is created or changed. They can add timestamps, record who made an edit, clean incoming values, or set stored defaults
• Custom widgets: Build specialized views with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript while Grist continues to manage the underlying records
• Portable .grist files: Download the full document as a SQLite-based file containing its data, attachments, layouts, metadata, and recent history

Pricing

Grist Cloud

• Free
• Pro: $8/user/month, billed annually
• Business: $24/user/month, billed annually
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Self-hosted

• Grist Community edition: Free and open source
• Full Grist: $24/user/month, billed annually
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Ratings

• G2: Not enough reviews
• Capterra: Not enough reviews

A G2 user said:

Where it taps out: Grist counts the record limit across every table in a document. The Pro plan tops out at 100,000 rows and Business at 150,000, while Grist recommends keeping document data around 20 MB for smoother performance. A database with several large related tables can hit those practical limits sooner than the headline row count suggests.

9. SQL Server Express (Best for keeping the front end you already built)

This is Microsoft again. SQL Server Express is the free edition of Microsoft SQL Server, and it solves a different part of the problem than Dataverse and Power Apps. Dataverse gives you a path toward a new cloud application. SQL Server Express lets you keep the desktop front end and move the data layer underneath it.

Tables move into SQL Server Express and link back through ODBC. Existing forms, reports, queries, macros, and VBA can keep working against those linked tables. Microsoft’s SQL Server Migration Assistant can handle much of the schema and data transfer during the move.

SQL Server now handles concurrent writes, transactions, locking, and storage. The existing desktop interface stays in place, while the shared data moves onto a database engine designed for heavier multi-user work. SQL Server 2025 Express also raised the maximum relational database size to 50 GB, giving smaller applications far more room than a desktop .accdb file.

Standout features

• Row-level security: Apply database-side rules that control which rows a user can read or update, even when several front ends connect to the same tables
• Always Encrypted: Protect sensitive column values while keeping encryption keys separate from the database engine
• Native JSON and full-text search: SQL Server 2025 Express supports JSON data, JSON indexing, full-text search, and semantic search alongside conventional relational tables

Pricing

• SQL Server 2025 Express: Free
• Azure SQL Database: Consumption-based pricing

Ratings

• G2: 4.4/5 (2,200+ reviews)
• Capterra: 4.6/5 (1,980+ reviews)

A G2 user said:

Where it taps out: SQL Server Express has firm engine limits: 50 GB per relational database, up to four cores, and 1,410 MB of buffer-pool memory in SQL Server 2025. It also excludes SQL Server Agent, so scheduled backups and maintenance jobs need another scheduler, such as Windows Task Scheduler.

10. NocoDB (Best for adding a browser front end to an existing database)

If your records are in PostgreSQL or MySQL, NocoDB can put a browser interface over that database without moving the data again. It reads the existing schema and turns the tables into editable grids while the backend stays where it is.

For teams that have already modernized storage, the remaining job is often the front end. NocoDB Interfaces can turn the same data into forms, dashboards, record-review screens, and detail pages without exposing the schema underneath.

Custom Sync covers cases where production data should stay read-only. Selected PostgreSQL or MySQL tables can be refreshed into NocoDB manually or on a schedule, giving people a working copy for lookup, review, or reporting while the source system remains untouched.

Standout features

• Page Designer: Build print-ready invoices, certificates, summaries, and reports from live records, including data from linked tables, then export them as PDFs
• Visual workflows: Trigger multi-step processes from record events or schedules, then add conditions, loops, API calls, and other actions
• JavaScript scripting: Add custom logic when built-in workflow actions don’t cover the process, including calls to outside services and supported packages

Pricing

NocoDB Cloud

• Free
• Plus: $12/editor/month, billed annually
• Business: $24/editor/month, billed annually
• Scale: $45/editor/month, billed annually
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Self-hosted

• Community: Free
• Business: $24/seat/month, billed annually
• Scale: $45/seat/month, billed annually
• Enterprise: Custom pricing

Ratings

• NocoDB doesn’t yet have enough verified G2 or Capterra reviews to produce a meaningful aggregate rating

A Reddit user said:

Where it taps out: Connector support varies by database engine. PostgreSQL and MySQL fit NocoDB’s standard setup, but Microsoft SQL Server currently requires an Enterprise add-on. If you plan to keep SQL Server, that can make this route considerably more expensive.

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

How to Choose the Right Microsoft Access Alternative

Choosing the right Microsoft Access alternative starts with identifying which part of Access you rely on most. It may be the relational database underneath, the forms people work in, the reports they send out, or the macros and VBA that keep the process moving.

The second question is just as important: how much of that setup do you want to preserve? Some migration paths let you keep the Access front end and replace only the backend. Others require rebuilding almost everything around the data.

That distinction can change the size of the migration dramatically. Moving tables is often the straightforward part. Forms, reports, linked data sources, macros, and VBA are where years of business logic tend to accumulate.

Before you commit, inventory those pieces alongside the records themselves. A database with five tables and a dozen custom routines may take more work to replace than one with fifty straightforward tables.

Plan limits deserve the same attention. Grist, Baserow, Airtable, and other hosted options impose different limits on documents, workspaces, storage, or plans. If you’re unsure how much of the old setup needs replacing, prototype one representative workflow first. Build the records, intake form, relationships, and one report, then compare that with what the current database does.

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

How to Migrate From Microsoft Access Without Losing Data or Workflows

Don’t start by exporting every table. An Access database can hide important logic outside the data itself. Queries feed forms and reports, while macros and VBA can control what happens when someone clicks a button, opens a screen, or changes a record.

Microsoft’s migration guidance treats those pieces separately because tools such as SSMA can move tables and some queries, but they don’t convert forms, reports, macros, or VBA. Here are some steps to follow:

Back up and document the current database. Start with tables, relationships, queries, forms, reports, macros, VBA modules, and linked data sources. Access includes a Database Documenter that can generate a report on selected objects, while the Object Dependencies pane shows which forms, reports, and queries rely on one another. That’s more reliable than deciding what looks unused from the Navigation Pane alone.

Run Compact and Repair before you size the migration. Access doesn’t automatically reclaim all the disk space left behind by deleted objects and temporary data. Compact and Repair removes that unused space, which means the resulting file size is a better starting point for estimating what you’re actually moving. Back up the database first and make sure you have exclusive access while the operation runs.

Rebuild one representative workflow before the whole schema. Pick a form people rely on every day and reproduce the full experience around it: data entry, required fields, validation, permissions, attachments, and whatever should happen after submission.

Test one report that people depend on. Choose something with grouping, totals, page breaks, or a fixed PDF or print layout. Access reports are built specifically to format and present data, which is why replacing the tables doesn’t automatically replace the reporting layer. Decide early whether the new tool can reproduce that output or whether reporting will need its own solution.

Give every query, macro, and VBA routine a destination. A query might become a view or formula. A macro might become an automation or workflow. VBA may need custom code, a scheduled job, or a redesigned process. Don’t assume these pieces will follow the tables automatically. Microsoft notes that SSMA converts only certain select queries, while forms, reports, macros, and VBA modules require separate work.

Migrate a test copy and validate the result. Compare record counts, relationships, required fields, dates, numeric values, attachments, permissions, and any calculated output that people depend on. Run the busiest workflows against that copy before scheduling the final transfer.

Cut over only after the replacement survives real work. Keep both systems available long enough to cover the recurring processes you care about, including reporting. Once the new system is signed off, freeze the old .accdb as a read-only archive rather than deleting it immediately.

If the original database has become more of a workflow in practice, consider whether you need another general-purpose database at all. A workflow app may suit request queues, approvals, or operational trackers better, while dedicated inventory software may make more sense for stock and asset registers.

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

Is Microsoft Access Still Being Developed?

Yes. Microsoft still offers Access 2024 as a standalone purchase and includes Access with several Microsoft 365 plans. The subscription version continues to receive newer features, including the Monaco SQL editor with syntax highlighting, autocomplete, and formatting.

Microsoft has also added modern chart types and an Edge Browser Control to display web content within forms.

There is one important distinction. Some newer features, including the Monaco editor, are exclusive to Microsoft 365 and aren’t available in the perpetual Access 2024 release.

So, Access hasn’t been abandoned. But newer features don’t solve the reasons many teams look elsewhere, such as Mac support, browser access, mobile data entry, heavier concurrency, or centralized governance.

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

Microsoft Access to Dataverse Migration Costs

Microsoft has a built-in way to move Access data to Dataverse. It can migrate tables, data, and supported relationships, then link the Dataverse tables back to Access so the existing front end can keep working during the transition.

The catch is that this mainly moves the data layer. If you plan to retire Access completely, forms, reports, macros, and VBA still need their own migration path. Some data types also need preparation, particularly multivalue lookups and floating-point fields.

Power Apps Premium currently costs $20/user/month, with each license adding 250 MB of Dataverse database capacity. Qualifying tenants also receive 10 GB of default database capacity, while additional storage costs $40/GB/month.

That makes Microsoft’s migration tool useful, but the real cost depends on how much of the application around the data still needs to be rebuilt.

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

When a Workflow Tool Makes More Sense Than Another Database

The tools in this guide cover what people want from a Microsoft Access alternative, including relational data, forms, reporting, browser access, self-hosting, stronger permissions, and a more reliable backend. The right choice depends on what your current database is doing.

There’s one case where it’s worth looking beyond another database.

If each record also needs an owner, status, deadline, approval, or next step, you’re managing a workflow alongside the data. That’s where a platform like ClickUp becomes worth testing because the record and the work around it can live in the same place.

Summarize this article with AI ClickUp Brain not only saves you precious time by instantly summarizing articles, it also leverages AI to connect your tasks, docs, people, and more, streamlining your workflow like never before. Summarize article

Summarize this article for me please

Want to save even more time? Try ClickUp Brain free

Frequently Asked Questions About Microsoft Access Alternatives

Everything you need to stay organized and get work done.

Sign Up Contact Sales