Confluence vs. Microsoft Teams: Where Does Your Knowledge Actually Live in 2026?
Confluence and Microsoft Teams solve different parts of the same knowledge problem.
Confluence gives teams a dedicated place to structure and maintain documentation. Microsoft Teams brings conversations, meetings, files, notes, and Microsoft 365 apps into one collaboration hub.
The catch with Teams is that knowledge rarely lives in Teams alone. Channel files live in SharePoint, chat files in OneDrive, notes in OneNote, and meeting content can spread across Teams, Loop, and other Microsoft 365 tools. Microsoft also retired the built-in Teams Wiki in favor of OneNote, which pulls the wider ecosystem into the comparison.
The decision rests on where your team expects lasting knowledge to live and how easily people can retrieve it later.
This guide compares Confluence vs. Teams across knowledge management, search, collaboration, permissions, integrations, AI, ecosystem fit, and cost. We’ll also look at a third option for teams where splitting knowledge and execution across separate tools is already the problem.
- Confluence vs. Microsoft Teams at a Glance
- What Is Confluence?
- What Is Microsoft Teams?
- Where Knowledge Gets Lost: Confluence vs. Microsoft Teams
- How Do Confluence and Microsoft Teams Handle Permissions and Integrations?
- How to Choose Between Confluence and Microsoft Teams
- Does Microsoft Have an Equivalent to Confluence?
- Confluence vs. Microsoft Teams Pricing Compared
- What Real Users Say on Reddit: Confluence vs. Microsoft Teams
- Where Does ClickUp Fit Between Confluence and Microsoft Teams?
- Confluence vs. Microsoft Teams: Final Verdict
- Frequently Asked Questions About Confluence vs. Teams
Summarize this article for me pleaseConfluence vs. Microsoft Teams at a Glance
| Compare* | Confluence | Microsoft Teams |
| Best for | Long-lived documentation, technical knowledge, SOPs, policies, and Jira-linked work | Chat, meetings, calls, file sharing, and day-to-day collaboration |
| Core model | Dedicated knowledge base | Collaboration hub across Microsoft 365 |
| Knowledge structure | Spaces, nested pages, live docs, databases, and page ownership | Channels, chats, files, SharePoint, OneNote, and Loop |
| Meetings and calling | Not a core capability | Built in, with recording, transcription, and calling; intelligent recap needs Teams Premium or Copilot |
| Knowledge management | Strong for durable, browsable company knowledge | Spread across several Microsoft 365 tools rather than one wiki |
| AI | Rovo for search, summaries, Q&A, drafting, and Agents | Copilot (paid license) for chats, meetings, recaps, and action items |
| Ecosystem advantage | Jira and the Atlassian stack | Outlook, SharePoint, OneDrive, Office, and Microsoft 365 |
| Entry paid plan | Standard: $7.15/user/month, billed monthly | Teams Essentials: $4/user/month, paid yearly |
| Main trade-off | Better structure for knowledge, weaker for live communication | Better live collaboration, weaker as a dedicated knowledge base |
| Choose it when… | People need to find and maintain the same knowledge months or years later | Work happens mainly through meetings, channels, and Microsoft 365 files |
How we review software at ClickUp
Our editorial team follows a transparent, research-backed, and vendor-neutral process, so you can trust that our recommendations are based on real product value.
Here’s a detailed rundown of how we review software at ClickUp.
Summarize this article for me pleaseWhat Is Confluence?
Confluence is Atlassian’s knowledge base. Every page lives inside a space, sits at a fixed spot in a page tree, and stays there for as long as the team needs it. That permanence makes it the default home for documentation a company can’t afford to lose, like technical specs, runbooks, onboarding guides, policies, and project plans.
A page keeps its full version history, comments attach to highlighted text, and live docs, databases, and whiteboards sit beside pages in the same tree. Teams on Jira get the tightest link: a spec can pull in the tickets it produced, and a ticket can point back to the decision that created it.
However, Confluence isn’t a place for long discussions. Conversation happens in page comments. Chat, calls, and meetings happen elsewhere.
Also Read: Confluence vs. Google Docs
Who Confluence is built for
Confluence fits documentation-heavy teams, like:
- Engineering teams maintaining architecture notes, runbooks, and technical specs
- Product teams documenting requirements, decisions, and roadmaps
- Ops teams managing SOPs and process documentation
- HR teams publishing policies, onboarding material, and internal guidance
- Cross-functional teams contributing to one knowledge base over months or years
It pays off most when Jira is already in the workflow and documentation needs to stay close to delivery work.
Confluence standout features
- Gives knowledge a navigable hierarchy: Spaces act as top-level containers, and pages, live docs, databases, whiteboards, and Smart Links live inside the content tree. People browse by context instead of leaning on search for everything
- Makes ownership explicit: Every page, live doc, database, and whiteboard gets an owner by default, and the owner or an admin can transfer ownership when someone changes teams or leaves. Long-lived content always has a point person
- Keeps recoverable versions: Published pages retain version history and roll back on demand. Live docs version automatically, while collaborators see edits in real time
- Helps admins clear out stale knowledge: On Premium and Enterprise plans, Content Manager filters content by last activity, owner, status, label, or contributor, then archives, deletes, reassigns, or runs automations in bulk
- Connects documentation to Jira and outside work: Jira issues and project data surface inside Confluence, and Smart Links pull content from other apps into the same tree
- Searches beyond Confluence with Rovo: Rovo Search queries connected sources such as Jira, Google Drive, and SharePoint alongside Confluence from one search bar
Confluence pricing
- Free
- Standard: $7.15/user/month (for a team of 100 users)
- Premium: $14.10/user/month (for a team of 100 users)
- Enterprise: Custom pricing
Confluence ratings
- G2: 4.1/5 (4,300+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.5/5 (3,700+ reviews)
What Confluence users say
A G2 user says:
How good is Confluence’s AI?
Atlassian’s Rovo can:
- Search Confluence, Jira, and connected sources from one place
- Answer questions against internal knowledge
- Summarize and rewrite content
- Run conversational research through Rovo Chat
- Run specialized Agents for repeatable work
Rovo credits pool across the organization: 25 per user per month on the Standard plan, 70 on Premium, 150 on Enterprise. Heavier agentic and deep-reasoning actions burn more credits, while some embedded features, like Rovo Search, are free.
Where Confluence taps out
Confluence stores decisions, but the discussions behind them happen in other tools. It has no chat, calls, or meetings, so decisions get made in Slack, Teams, or Zoom, and someone has to copy them onto a page. Atlassian’s Teams app helps a little: you can take meeting notes in a side panel and publish them to a space. The notes still depend on someone taking them.
Keeping a large knowledge base current also costs more than the entry plan. Content Manager finds stale pages by last activity and archives or reassigns them in bulk, but it’s only on Premium and Enterprise. Page owners don’t change automatically when someone leaves, so an admin has to reassign their pages, or those pages end up with owners who no longer maintain them. AI has a ceiling too: agentic work uses up the Standard credit allowance faster than basic search.
Summarize this article for me pleaseWhat Is Microsoft Teams?
Microsoft Teams is Microsoft’s collaboration hub for chat, channels, meetings, calls, file sharing, and app-based teamwork. It’s the main workspace for many Microsoft 365 teams, bringing conversations, meetings, docs, apps, and notifications into one place.
However, much of the content you see in Teams is stored elsewhere in Microsoft 365:
- Files and Loop components shared in channels are stored in SharePoint
- Files and Loop components shared in chats are stored in OneDrive for Business
- Channel notes can use OneNote
That means Teams often works more like a front door into Microsoft 365 than a standalone repository.
Also Read: Microsoft Teams Pros and Cons
Who Microsoft Teams is built for
Teams fits organizations where work moves through conversations and meetings:
- Remote and hybrid teams coordinating in real time
- Departments that rely on Outlook calendars and Microsoft 365 files
- Project teams that need channels for ongoing discussion
- Companies standardized on SharePoint, OneDrive, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint
- External-facing teams that host client calls, webinars, or partner meetings
Microsoft Teams standout features
- Handles meetings end-to-end: Scheduling, calling, recording, transcription, screen sharing, live captions, and post-meeting recap all run from one place. For recorded or transcribed meetings, Recap gathers the recording, transcript, shared files, notes, agenda, and follow-up tasks. With Teams Premium or Copilot, intelligent recap also breaks recordings into topics and chapters
- Keeps communication organized by channel: Channels give projects and departments a persistent home for posts, replies, files, tabs, apps, and meeting activity, which keeps team-wide context out of direct messages
- Opens Microsoft 365 files in place: Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files open and edit inside Teams while SharePoint and OneDrive hold the underlying storage
- Turns meetings into follow-through with Copilot: Copilot summarizes discussion, identifies who said what, suggests action items, and answers questions during or after a meeting
- Runs the meeting itself with Facilitator: The Facilitator agent generates collaborative notes, tracks decisions and open questions, keeps the meeting on agenda, and can produce a Word document from the discussion and shared files. Facilitator requires a Microsoft 365 Copilot license
- Extends into a wider app ecosystem: Microsoft Teams integrations pull business tools into channels, and AI notetakers for Microsoft Teams add more options for meeting capture
Microsoft Teams pricing
- Free
- Teams Essentials: $4/user/month, paid yearly
- Microsoft 365 Business Basic: $7/user/month, paid yearly
- Microsoft 365 Business Standard with Copilot: $23.50/user/month, paid yearly
- Microsoft 365 E3: $39/user/month, paid yearly
- Microsoft 365 E5: $60/user/month, paid yearly
Microsoft Teams ratings
- G2: 4.4/5 (19,000+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.5/5 (11,000+ reviews)
What Microsoft Teams users say
A G2 user mentions:
How good is Microsoft Teams’ AI?
Copilot is strongest around meetings and conversations.
It can:
- Summarize meetings and chats
- Pull out decisions and action items
- Answer questions about a meeting transcript
- Create follow-up tasks
- Generate audio and video recaps
- Help Facilitator produce collaborative notes and meeting documents
Chat and channels have an important limit, though. Copilot works from the message thread it’s opened in, using a 30-day history by default unless you specify a different period. It also can’t summarize images, Loop components, or files shared in that thread. However, Copilot can summarize shared Word files separately from the file preview.
Where Microsoft Teams taps out
Summarize this article for me pleaseWhere Knowledge Gets Lost: Confluence vs. Microsoft Teams
Both tools make information hard to recover later, for opposite reasons. Confluence loses context in the archive: the page exists, and the trouble is finding the current one. Microsoft Teams loses context in the conversation: the decision was made, but documentation needs extra steps.
Confluence loses context in the archive
In Confluence, the answer is usually written down somewhere. Your job is to locate it among years of documentation and confirm it’s still current.
That shows up as:
- Several near-identical pages on the same topic
- Archived content surfacing beside current guidance
- Search results that assume you already know roughly what you’re looking for
Confluence gives teams tools for this: page ownership, archiving, version history, labels, and Content Manager. The underlying job is still curation, and curation takes people.
Microsoft Teams loses context in the conversation
In Teams, important context starts as a message, a meeting discussion, a shared file, a Loop component, or a note, and stays in that form.
A decision made in a channel may be searchable later. That doesn’t make it a self-contained piece of documentation. The reasoning behind it can sit across replies, meetings, recordings, and files, each stored in a different part of Microsoft 365. The question stops being “where is the file?” and becomes “which artifact holds the final answer?”
Better search is not the answer. Teams needs a process for turning decisions into written knowledge. Confluence needs a process for keeping that knowledge current.
For a look at turning project decisions and context into documentation people revisit, this walkthrough shows how to structure project documentation so it stays usable over time.
Summarize this article for me pleaseHow Do Confluence and Microsoft Teams Handle Permissions and Integrations?
Confluence controls access to pages and spaces in one place, and connects most deeply to Jira. In Teams, access to knowledge depends on SharePoint and OneDrive permissions, and its integrations run through apps and Microsoft 365.
| Category | Confluence | Microsoft Teams |
| Permission model | 3 levels: global permissions for the whole site, space permissions for each space, and view or edit restrictions on individual pages | Role-based: owners manage the team, members collaborate, and guests get fewer permissions |
| Guests and external users | Guests are invited into a space and can access one space at a time; each paid user can bring up to 5 free guests. Public links let anyone with the link view a page, live doc, or whiteboard | Guests join a team and work on its files; external access lets people at other organizations call and chat with your users without joining a team |
| Restricted areas | Page restrictions limit who can view or edit specific content, and space admins grant or revoke access space by space | Private channels are limited to their own members; shared channels let people from other organizations join one channel without guest accounts |
| File permissions | Attachments live on Confluence pages, so space permissions and page restrictions cover them, with no separate file system to manage | Inherited from SharePoint (channel files) and OneDrive (chat files); each private or shared channel gets its own SharePoint site |
| Admin and identity controls | Confluence and site admins can access permissions for any space. Atlassian Guard adds single sign-on, user provisioning, API token management, and security policies, and an audit log tracks admin activity | Admins set policies in the Teams admin center; Microsoft Purview sensitivity labels control privacy and external sharing |
| Core integration | Jira: the Jira work items macro shows a live list of work items on a page, and you can create one work item from highlighted text or several from a table | Microsoft 365: Word, Excel, and PowerPoint open and edit inside Teams |
| Apps and automation | Over 1,000 Marketplace apps. Smart Links preview content from Google Drive, Figma, Slack, Dropbox, and Salesforce inside a page. Admins can connect SharePoint, Slack, GitHub, and Zoom so Rovo Search covers them | More than 700 apps; tabs pin apps to a channel; Workflows (built on Power Automate) handles automations |
| Connecting the two | The Confluence Cloud app for Teams attaches pages and live docs to channels and adds a meeting notes panel that publishes to a space. A separate Slack app sends Confluence notifications to Slack and lets people reply to comments there | Jira Cloud for Teams turns a chat message into a Jira issue and adds Jira tabs to channels |
Summarize this article for me pleaseHow to Choose Between Confluence and Microsoft Teams
The choice comes down to where your team’s work starts and where important context needs to live afterward.
Pick Confluence if:
- You maintain technical docs, SOPs, policies, or onboarding guides that need an owner and a long shelf life
- You want specs, decisions, and delivery work linked, and Jira is where delivery gets tracked
- People need to browse knowledge by hierarchy, with the current version easy to spot
- Version history, ownership, and archiving matter more to you than real-time conversation
Pick Microsoft Teams if:
- Most collaboration happens through meetings, calls, channels, and chat
- Outlook, SharePoint, and Office already run the rest of the company
- Files and conversations need to stay side by side while work is active
- Your documentation needs are light enough for SharePoint, OneNote, and Loop to cover without a dedicated wiki
Pick both if:
Teams handles live collaboration and Confluence holds the record. That setup works when conversations happen in Microsoft 365 and final decisions, processes, and technical documentation need a structured home afterward. The cost is a handoff: someone has to carry the decision from the channel to the page.
Summarize this article for me pleaseDoes Microsoft Have an Equivalent to Confluence?
Not exactly. SharePoint is Microsoft’s closest equivalent to Confluence, and Microsoft spreads the rest of knowledge management across OneNote, Loop, and Teams.
- SharePoint handles document libraries, intranet pages, permissions, and company-wide content. Every team in Teams gets a SharePoint site. It’s the closest fit for a formal knowledge base where documents, permissions, and intranet structure matter
- OneNote covers shared notebooks, meeting notes, and reference material that doesn’t need a formal hierarchy
- Loop handles live, portable content. Components stay in sync across Teams, Outlook, OneNote, and Whiteboard, and Loop pages give teams a flexible canvas for collaborative planning
Teams is the layer that brings those three into the daily workflow. It holds none of the knowledge itself.
If you want the closest Microsoft-native answer to Confluence, start with SharePoint. If your knowledge forms across meetings, chats, notes, and files, expect to use all four.
Summarize this article for me pleaseConfluence vs. Microsoft Teams Pricing Compared
Confluence and Microsoft Teams follow different pricing logic. Confluence is a dedicated knowledge workspace priced on its own. Teams sells standalone or inside Microsoft 365 plans that bundle storage, Office apps, email, and other business tools.
| Category | Confluence Cloud | Microsoft Teams |
| Free option | Free for up to 10 users; 2 GB storage; no custom permissions or Rovo credits | Teams Free: 60-minute meetings, 100 participants, 5 GB per user |
| Entry paid plan | Standard: $7.15/user/month; 250 GB storage, permissions, Rovo (25 credits/user) | Teams Essentials: $4/user/month; 10 GB per user; meetings, calls, chat, and file sharing |
| Mid tier | Premium: $14.10/user/month; unlimited storage, Rovo (70 credits/user), Content Manager | Microsoft 365 Business Basic: $7/user/month; 1 TB per user, web and mobile Office apps, email, web-grounded AI chat |
| AI-inclusive tier | All paid plans include Rovo Search, Chat, and Agents; Premium raises credits to 70/user | Business Standard with Copilot: $23.50/user/month; desktop Office apps, Copilot connected to work data |
| Enterprise | Custom pricing; 150 Rovo credits/user | E3 ($39) and E5 ($60) suites; Microsoft 365 Copilot available as an add-on |
| Potential extras | Marketplace apps, Atlassian Guard, other Atlassian products | Teams Premium ($10), Teams Phone, Teams Rooms, higher Microsoft 365 tiers |
The Microsoft tiers differ widely in scope. The Teams Essentials plan is the cleanest Teams-only comparison: chat, calls, meetings, transcripts, and 10 GB of storage for $4. The Business Basic plan at $7 adds web and mobile Office apps, email, and 1 TB of storage. Business Standard with Copilot at $23.50 is the first bundle in this table that includes work-grounded AI.
That range changes the buying question. Compare Confluence against the Teams Essentials plan, and Confluence costs more for a narrower product. Compare it with a Microsoft 365 bundle your company already pays for, and Confluence becomes an additional line item that must justify itself on knowledge management alone.
Summarize this article for me pleaseWhat Real Users Say on Reddit: Confluence vs. Microsoft Teams
Recent Reddit discussions land on the same split we discussed so far: Confluence is the natural home for structured documentation, and Microsoft Teams earns its place by staying close to the wider Microsoft 365 workflow.
A r/sharepoint Reddit thread from a team that had already run Confluence described the trade-off. Confluence worked as a knowledge base, but because everything else lived in SharePoint and Teams, the wiki felt disconnected from the rest of the stack. Replies leaned toward a Microsoft-native split: SharePoint pages for a formal knowledge base, and Loop for lighter collaborative knowledge that embeds in Teams.
The Reddit user summed up, saying:
In another r/ProductManagement Reddit thread, one user said Confluence works well as the documentation layer beside other Atlassian products.
In the words of the Reddit user:
The same user further added:
Reddit Consensus: Confluence gives knowledge a dedicated home. Microsoft’s advantage is proximity: knowledge sits next to chat, meetings, SharePoint, OneDrive, and Loop.
Summarize this article for me pleaseWhere Does ClickUp Fit Between Confluence and Microsoft Teams?
The gap we’ve been tracing through user reviews is still real: conversations, documentation, planning, and execution often live in separate systems, and context gets lost in the handoff. That’s also why ClickUp belongs in this comparison.
ClickUp is the world’s first Converged AI Workspace, and it closes that gap. Docs, Wikis, Chat, SyncUps, Planner, tasks, search, and Brain² sit in one workspace, so a decision moves from discussion to documentation to execution without being rebuilt along the way.
ClickUp standout features
- Turns ClickUp Docs into lasting knowledge: ClickUp’s wikis support collaborative writing, comments, nested pages, synced content, and task creation from any line. Any Doc can become a Wiki, which marks it as a source of truth and gives the native AI priority when answering workspace questions
- Builds a searchable knowledge layer across work: ClickUp Knowledge Management brings Docs, Wikis, tasks, and every other piece of work into one system, and Docs Hub gives teams a central place to search, sort, and filter that content
- Keeps conversation beside the work: ClickUp Chat lives in the same workspace as tasks and Docs, and messages stay attached to the projects they affect. Brain² summarizes channels, answers questions, and turns messages into assigned work
- Runs live calls without leaving the workspace: ClickUp SyncUps start voice or video calls straight from Chat, and the discussion stays linked to the work it’s about
- Keeps planning close to execution: ClickUp Calendar sits alongside tasks, Chat, and AI, so scheduling happens where the work already lives
- Searches ClickUp and connected apps together: ClickUp Enterprise Search connects tasks, Docs, and connected tools like Google Drive, Slack, Gmail, and Figma, and returns contextual answers with sources
- Uses AI across the same context: ClickUp Brain² works across tasks, Docs, Wikis, Chat, and connected sources. It answers questions, summarizes work, creates tasks, and turns existing context into reports, slide decks, dashboards, and other artifacts
ClickUp pricing
Free Forever
Free Free
Key features
60 MB Storage
Unlimited Tasks & Subtasks
Unlimited Free Members
Collaborative Docs
Kanban Boards
Calendar View
Core
$9 $12
user / mo · billed yearly
Everything in Free Forever, plus:
Custom Fields & Task Types
Unlimited Storage and Spaces
Unlimited Forms
Unlimited Gantt Charts
Unlimited ClickUp Chat
1K Automations
Business
Popular
$17 $25
user / mo · billed yearly
Everything in Core, plus:
Advanced Dashboards
Webhooks & Automation Integrations
10K Automations
Resource Management
Google SSO + SMS 2FA
Private Views
Enterprise
Custom Custom
Talk to our team
Everything in Business, plus:
White Labeling
1M Automations
Unlimited Custom Roles
Enterprise Permissions & Governance
Advanced SSO, SCIM, SAML
Audit Logs & Session Management
MAX
The full Max AI engine plus every Enterprise-grade control.
$100 $120
user / mo · billed yearly
Everything in Enterprise, plus:
ClickUp Brain²
Maximum Premium Model Usage
Custom Skills
Context Engine & Auto-Memory
Max AI Engine
Unlimited AI Fields
Unlimited Notetaker
Unlimited AI Image Generation
Everything in Enterprise:
White Labeling
1M Automations
Audit Logs & Session Management
* Prices when billed annually
ClickUp ratings
- G2: 4.6/5 (14,200+ reviews)
- Capterra: 4.6/5 (4,600+ reviews)
What ClickUp customers say
PrograMetrix, a digital advertising agency specializing in paid media, had the exact setup this comparison describes: tasks in Wrike, documentation in Confluence, conversations in Microsoft Teams, and none of the three talking to each other.
Riley Tompkins, Director of Technology and AdOps at PrograMetrix, on the move:
Where ClickUp taps out
ClickUp makes less sense when your company is standardized on Microsoft 365 and Teams already runs how everyone communicates, meets, stores files, and works in Office. Replacing Teams in that setup means a migration and a change management effort, and the payoff has to be large enough to justify both.
Keeping Teams and connecting it to ClickUp works, with limits. The Microsoft Teams integration creates tasks from messages and previews ClickUp links in channels. A Workspace-level search connection covers only public Teams messages, though, and private chats show up only when each person connects their own account. Enterprise Search is available on all plans as a limited-time trial.
The same holds for companies that mainly need a dedicated wiki and run on Jira. Confluence is the more natural fit there, because Jira issues and project data already surface inside Confluence pages.
Summarize this article for me pleaseConfluence vs. Microsoft Teams: Final Verdict
Confluence and Teams do different jobs. Confluence keeps the record, and Teams hosts the conversation. That split works well while someone owns the handoff between them. Every decision made in a channel or meeting has to be written onto a Confluence page, and every page has to be checked again when the decision changes. When that work slips, the channel holds the latest answer and the page holds an outdated one.
Running both also means two subscriptions, two permission models, and two places to search.
ClickUp removes the handoff by keeping docs, wikis, chat, calls, and tasks in one workspace. A decision made in Chat can turn into an assigned task in the same place, and the Doc that records it can be marked as a Wiki, so Brain² treats it as the source of truth. Teams that aren’t ready to leave Microsoft Teams can connect it and search those conversations from ClickUp while they decide.
Summarize this article for me pleaseFrequently Asked Questions About Confluence vs. Teams
Can you use Confluence inside Microsoft Teams?
Yes. Atlassian’s official Confluence Cloud for Microsoft Teams app pins Confluence pages as channel tabs and lets you view, edit, and comment on them without leaving Teams. It also adds a Confluence notes panel to Teams meetings: take notes during the call, publish them to a space, and the app automatically formats attendees and action items. You can share and edit live docs in Teams, though you can’t create them there yet.
Is Microsoft Loop a Confluence alternative?
Partly. Loop workspaces and pages give teams a flexible, collaborative canvas, and Loop components stay in sync wherever they’re embedded. It doesn’t offer Confluence’s page-tree hierarchy, content ownership, archiving, or admin tooling for large knowledge bases. Loop suits project workspaces and living planning documents; SharePoint pages remain Microsoft’s closer match for a formal wiki.
Does ClickUp integrate with Microsoft Teams?
Yes. The Microsoft Teams integration creates ClickUp tasks from Teams messages, unfurls task and Doc links in channels, and posts ClickUp activity to a channel you choose. With Enterprise Search enabled, Teams conversations become searchable in ClickUp, so a decision made in a Teams chat can surface next to the task it affects.
Is Teams being phased out?
No. Microsoft Teams isn’t being retired. Microsoft has changed how it’s bundled with Office, though. On September 12, 2025, the European Commission made Microsoft’s commitments legally binding, requiring it to offer Office 365 and Microsoft 365 without Teams at a lower price, improve interoperability with competing tools, and support Teams data portability. The commitments run for seven years, and ten for interoperability and data portability. Microsoft retired the Teams Wiki feature separately, with access ending in 2024.
Everything you need to stay organized and get work done.
Recent Articles
The Best Task Management Software in 2026: 10 Tools Compared 
The Best Task Management Software in 2026: 10 Tools Compared
