
Crafting compelling debate arguments goes beyond research—it's about organizing thoughts clearly and persuasively.
From gathering evidence to structuring points and anticipating counterarguments, debate teams juggle numerous sources, notes, and deadlines. AI prompts are now an indispensable part of this process.
Debate teams rely on AI to:
Integrated into familiar tools—like documents, brainstorming boards, and task lists—AI in platforms such as ClickUp Brain goes beyond simple assistance. It organizes your ideas into clear, actionable debate strategies.
Identify 5 distinct opening approaches for a climate change debate, inspired by the ‘Global Warming 2024’ briefing.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Analyzes linked documents to extract key themes and suggests varied opening strategies tailored to the topic.
Summarize popular persuasive methods used in recent policy debates under $25K audience reach.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Gathers insights from internal research files; Brain Max can supplement with relevant external data if accessible.
Create a structured rebuttal outline referencing notes from ‘Fiscal Policy Debate’ and previous argument summaries.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Extracts key points and organizes them into a clear, actionable rebuttal plan.
Summarize pros and cons of two education reform arguments using the ‘Education Reform Q2’ document.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Pulls data from internal reports and delivers a concise comparative analysis.
Identify leading studies and data sources cited in recent healthcare debates, referencing R&D notes and expert reports.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Scans documents to compile a list of frequently referenced evidence and their key findings.
From the ‘Fact Verification Protocol’ document, produce a detailed checklist for validating debate assertions.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Extracts verification steps and formats them into an actionable checklist within a task or document.
Identify recent shifts in debate presentation techniques from post-2023 research and training materials.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Detects patterns and highlights notable changes from linked study notes.
Summarize main audience engagement factors from the ‘Youth Debate Survey Q1’ document.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Analyzes survey data to extract common preferences and feedback themes.
Write concise, impactful closing remarks reflecting the tone and style outlined in the voice guide.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: References tone guidelines to suggest varied closing statement options.
Outline key changes in debate regulations and their effects on argument structure, based on internal compliance documents.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Reviews policy updates and summarizes implications for debate preparation.
Extract timing rules and best practices from regional competition documents to create a management checklist.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Compiles timing constraints and recommendations into an easy-to-follow guide.
Using ‘Logical Fallacies Handbook’ and debate case files, produce a checklist to identify common reasoning errors.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Identifies fallacy types and organizes them into a practical evaluation tool.
Summarize how different teams employ emotional rhetoric, referencing competitive analysis documents.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Condenses comparative data into a clear, accessible summary or table.
Analyze recent research and reports to identify shifts in debate tactics adapted for online formats.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Synthesizes findings from internal notes and uploaded studies.
Extract and prioritize participant feedback regarding format, pacing, and interaction from regional event reports.
ClickUp Brain Behavior: Aggregates user comments and survey data to highlight common concerns and suggestions.
Brain Max Boost: Quickly access past debates, critiques, and research materials to fuel your upcoming discussions.

Brain Max Boost: Instantly access previous argument data, evidence comparisons, or debate strategy notes across all cases.

Debaters develop compelling points faster, refine their reasoning, and avoid getting stuck on initial ideas.